all 14 comments

[–]FlippyKing 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

So wait two weeks to get your 'booster', and be deficient in your "fully vaxxed" status, to flatten the heart attack curve?

Nancy Reagan was right: just say no.

[–]Gravi[S] 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

It's like they want to admit that the vaccine causes heart inflammation but doesn't at the same time, what kind of mental gymnastics is this?

[–]filbs111 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

What I find quite bizarre, is that it seems people aren't told, when receiving their jab, that they might want to take it easy for a week or two, avoid playing sports.

[–]FlippyKing 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

so, there was no informed consent.

[–]zyxzevn 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

They are just pretending to care about safety.

"Safe and effective"?
The reality behind the numbers:

Rare is now about 65%. About the same as 62% of blood-clots which you can proof with the D-Dimer tests. See 1 and 2

[–]BravoVictor 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"That's a very rare side effect. It basically never happens. But, uh, we're going to advise that everyone adjust their dosing so they don't die from this thing that definitely never happens..."

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

i am getting my first vaccine shot in about 175 years from now.. i just wanna be safe, lol..

[–]iamonlyoneman 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I have a better way to lower the risk of heart inflammation from the jabs.

[–]Tiwaking 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

If Vaccines were made by Microsoft, they'd advertise the side effects as 'Features'.

[–]MrJoshua 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

How the gaslight persists.

[–]hfxB0oyA 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But we were told that the science was settled that it's very rare and almost completely safe. Why would they need to consider this, then?

[–]NitexKnight 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I swear anytime something negative comes out about the vaccines reddit, twitter and other major news/social medias have to put out these "fact check" statements that discredit and tone it down. Because facts aren't important if they contradict the narrative.

[–]viperocco 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

@Tiwaking haha nice..

[–]WalkingIn2Madness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yeah right