all 14 comments

[–]Touchngo 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Double-diversity score! Fuck any other accomplishments and record! As long as it's a black woman, that's all that matters!

[–]Brewdabier[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I kinda thought the same, soon more crimes and https://files.catbox.moe/s4pnsm.mp4

[–]Tiwaking 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Martin Luther King: So even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream. I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.
President Joe Biden: Lets just fill it with negroes

[–]Brewdabier[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

America is in for a shit show and blacks will rule the country.

[–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Look at every country run by the nigras. They are all shitholes. We need us the Gulf, Southern, and Atlantic States of America. /s/GSA

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

None of those great Texas judges?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I doubt many people have an issue with a black woman being in the court. But why the fuck did he have to say it in those terms? That way of saying things suggest that she is better or chosen because she is black. That is racist.

[–]Brewdabier[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

First off he reading off a teleprompter and the speech was written by someone else, as for racist. Saying I'm choosing a black is not racist, this is a move to calm the blacks down (IMO).

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Hiring a person because they are black is racist. It’s the same as not hiring a person because they are black. Or hiring a person because they are white. Literally, that is what racism is.

It is okay to say you are considering a black person because they offer a different perspective. Same with white, or whatever. But to say you are hiring a certain race only is absolutely racism. And it matters.

It matters if we hire a black woman and say she was hired because she was a black person.

Or you can hire a black person, and say I hired this person because they are qualified, and the fact that they are black increases minority representation in the government. It also increases female representation in the government.

It is a huge fucking difference.

And people would loose their fucking kind if we started firing black people and hiring white people. Because they are black and because they are white.

[–]Brewdabier[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Hiring a person because they are black is racist.

So every employer is racist, get over it.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is illegal.

[–]BravoVictor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Seriously. Talk about saying the quiet part out loud. It's like he's trying to sound as stupid and divisive as possible. He could have just picked a black woman, claimed she was the most qualified, and achieved the same goal. But he wanted to look explicitly racist.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It makes it sound like he hired her because of race. Hiring white people or firing black people is illegal.

Explicitly racist. It’s insane.

[–]wtfppl-1st 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Who gives a shit if they are black and female when you look at the careers of Eunice C. Lee & Candace Jackson-Akiwumi. Both have been hard at work for over 40 years, each. Their Judgements in cases brought before The Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing are worth noting that these ladies have a good grasp of the constitution and do not have notable biases in their judgements, unless those biases sway heavy toward constitutionality. Both have presided over hundreds of cases at the State courts they are local at. They are both the kind of ladies that have already made words regarding their understandings of how blue cities turned to shit because of State General Attorney's and their governors and mayors deciding not to prosecute repeat offenders.