Ghislaine Maxwell will reveal the names of eight ‘John Does’

submitted by Drewski from (news.com.au)

all 12 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]jet199 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Just "johns" works just fine.

[–]Canbot 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do it or STFU. Whenever someone claims they will reveal information it never happens. It is always a scam. Otherwise why announce it instead of releasing the info?

[–]BravoVictor 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Uh-oh. Looks like someone's about to Epstein themselves.

[–]FollowTheMoney 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is a cloud to distract and pacify the herd. Some good might come from it but in large part the implication of the intel community in this is what matters. Who started this? (Mossad, MI6, CIA etc) If so why? Then those in these positions need to be held accountable. All the ppl calling for the public shaming or "release the names" are partially misguided. Both should be done. She needs to out who she was reporting to not who was on the Epstein logs, that's more important imo.

[–]package 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

  • John Doe

  • John Doe

  • John Doe

  • John Doe

  • John Doe

  • John Doe

  • John Doe

  • John Doe

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Just eight? lol she probably had literally hundreds of high-profile clients.

Eight is damage control, not a release of information. Better than zero, but c'mon.

[–]Zapped 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

This is a misleading headline. She was trying to keep the names hidden during here trial, but since she was convicted, she will not fight the reveal. I think there were close to 200 names, but only 8 were in in question.

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I think there were close to 200 names, but only 8 were in in question.

Is there a list of that 200 anywhere?

[–]Zapped 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't know if the list is partially public or it is all private as of now. I found this statement:

"After careful review of the detailed objections submitted by Non-Party Does 17, 53, 54, 55, 73, 93 and 151, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell writes to inform the Court that she does not wish to further address those objections," Maxwell attorney Laura Menninger wrote. "Each of the listed Does has counsel who have ably asserted their own respective privacy rights. Ms. Maxwell therefore leaves it to this Court to conduct the appropriate review."

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am very surprised 4chan hasn't compiled a list already and shared it around

[–]sproketboy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hope it's Pinker and Shermer.

[–]iDontShift 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

8 in 30 or 40 years? oooOOoooOO