you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Reports from where? Are your sources trustworthy? Is the information corroborated by other sources? There isn't a secret global conspiracy to actively harm people with vaccines. We know this because we have access to the scientific data, and because we know that this is not the tradition with virology or the medical profession. To assume that all of this has recently changed, globally, in order to harm people, is ridiculous.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Reports from where? Are your sources trustworthy?

It's like you're claiming to be on a different internet.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's like you're not reading anything scientific.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I've read scientific studies on the numbers of "scientists" who publish for pay, just make shit up, and value money over truth. I certainly don't worship science.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No one should worship science, as that would be the opposite purpose of its use (to avoid relying on blind faith, even if science has been developed by religious people).

Scientists who publish for direct payments are rare, but you can see obvious corporate sponsors of major scientific grants and programs who are definitely influencing the direction of the research, even if it has to be scientifically sound in order to work or make sense.