And then they came for the Lesbians.... BBC - 'We're being pressured into sex by some trans women'

submitted by The_Mad_Pirate from (archive.md)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

true. But all of the letters are degenerate, it is a race to the bottom to see who can have the weirder fetish. None of it should be allowed. After T next we will be adding pedophilia and beastiality.

[–]Elvira95 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

Yeah, because the fact I'm exclusivity attracted to the same sex is basically the same as wanting to rape children or animals or being a man who want the world to pretend he is a woman. The amount of insane bigots in this sub is giving me a good laugh.

[–]WhiteZealot 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

There are degrees of unhealthiness.

Homosexual activity is unhealthy because it 1) is wasted time and energy that should be going toward the advancement of your genetic interests (i.e. increasing the number or power of those who resemble you, genetically, or the extent to which their group average resembles you), 2) creates an association in the brain between homosexual activity and pleasure, thus making it more likely that you will do said activity again, and has other harmful psychological effects (e.g. creates a self-loathing, affects ability to have a healthy relationship with both men and women), and 3) inflicts these harms on another person.

Furthermore, being an open homosexual is unhealthy because it 1) sets a bad example to children, and makes it more likely they will partake in homosexual activity, and 2) alienates you from your community, because people have a natural disgust for homosexuality and do not want homos near their children.

[–]Elvira95 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

LMAO Oh God the delusion.

Homosexuality isn't a sexual disorder. It's a natural innate inclination. I had it since I was in like kindergarden, never knew homosexuals existed till I was like in my teen, lived in a very conservative little town, but my natural inclination and emotion towards female were there, because it's natural.

People don't have natural disgust from homosexuality, bigots do. It's true human got an aversion from what is different or from what they don't get, it's evolutionarity to work in patterns and having aversion from what doesn't fit pattern or what is different from us, being physically or sexually different, but with education and familiarity, this aversion pattern is lost.

I don't want to generate people similar to me, if I wanted to I would go to sperm bank. Fucking a woman is great natural pleasure, as my sexuality is naturally set toward females, and it will be pleasurable regardless of me being sexually active or totally not active like I am right now, while fucking a man could never be pleasurable since I'm not biologically capable of being sexually aroused by male traits. I would self-loathe myself if I fucked men against my nature, not the opposite. I can perfectly have healthy relationship with both sexes, I got not problem with men, I do actually prefer their company, I just don't want to touch their dicks.

There is no harm in a consensual relationship between two adults liking each others. But you are inflicting harm on human rationality with this pile of illogical bs.

[–]humancorpse 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Homosexuality isn't a sexual disorder. It's a natural innate inclination.

many men go homosexual after their first hit of crystal meth.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's still possible it's a disorder, but that doesn't make it wrong like everyone seems to think. I have a ton of disorders, is that wrong? No, it just makes my life harder, and in fact them being disorders validates my increased burdens. Humans are a very socialist and conformist species, any deviation from the norm at all is not what was "supposed" to happen. This can be good and bad, good because it's variety and dissent, bad because it could make things harder for you. No one has the right to tell you you have to be "cured" of something or pretend to be normal if you want it.

[–]MyLongestJourney 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Being an open lesbian is unhealthy because it 1) sets a bad example to children, and makes it more likely that children will have a sexual disorder and/or be open about said disorder

Evidence?

[–]WhiteZealot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Children are molded by the characteristics and behavior of those they interact with. A society in which there are no homos and no homo-friendly rhetoric is going to produce the least number of homos in the next generation. As you increase the exposure of children to homos (whether closeted or open) or homo-friendly rhetoric or raise the status of homos within society, you will get more homos in the next generation, up to a certain limit. If you need evidence beyond this reasoning, see this pic.

[–]MyLongestJourney 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Your initial hypothesis is that children will turn gay just by looking at gay people. Instead of providing evidence for this you attempt to argue that the more open homos exist,the more open homos will be in the next generation which is a totally different thing that your initial claim.The number of homosexual people stays the same,you just see more in the open. That does not mean that the population of homosexual people increases because young children see gay people and turn gay by imitation.

I would also like to add that today a lot of perfectly heterosexual kids claim the queer label for clout and oppression points.

[–]WhiteZealot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I've edited my comment above to make it more precise.

The number of homosexual people stays the same

This is the crux of your argument. Do you have any evidence to support this claim?

In light of the fact that the percentage of the population that is openly "trans" has been increasing during the same period that the percentage of the population that is openly homo has been increasing, don't you think it's more plausible that the percentage of the population that is homo has been increasing? Would you say that the percentage of the population that is "trans" is constant? If not, why is one constant but not the other?

[–]Elvira95 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Because a man who is porn obsessed and wants so much being in a lesbian porn fantasy or is an incel can turn trans just by saying he is trans and taking hormones. You cannot turn homosexual, the sexual and romantic attraction/orientation is something totally out of your control. Otherwise I would have not decided to be such a small minority,making life hard. That's why the trans population, which is today mostly het men with a fetish, is increasing, while the homo cannot possibly increase.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

You cannot turn homosexual, the sexual and romantic attraction/orientation is something totally out of your control.

Say "my", because I haven't found that to be the case at all. You really have no control or influence over your own wants and desires? That sounds pretty rough.

[–]Elvira95 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

No I don't have control on what arouse me nobody does, I cannot decide to get aroused or attracted physically or emotionally by males, even if I wanted to, my brain and physiology cannot. Nobody control their sexual attraction

[–]MyLongestJourney 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

1.Surveys that put the number of homosexual women around 2% or less.Homosexual men are a bit higher.

(No,I won't dig them up for you).

2.The notion that people turn gay because they see gay people display their homosexuality is ridiculous.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A society in which there are no homos and no homo-friendly rhetoric is going to produce the least number of homos in the next generation.

No, they'll just be forced to hide their sexuality to survive.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

increasing the number or power of those who resemble you, genetically, or the extent to which their group average resembles you

Yeah that's evil. It may be natural but it's evil.