all 9 comments

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (7 children)

E127 is only permitted for use in cocktail cherries and candied cherries in the UK and the EU, according to a statement from West Yorkshire Trading Standards sent to CNN Thursday.

What's so special about cherries? LOL

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

https://www.foodandnutritionjournal.org/volume7number3/toxic-effects-of-food-colorants-erythrosine-and-tartrazine-on-zebrafish-embryo-development/

Erythrosine is a poly-iodinated xanthene dye, widely used in foods, cosmetics and pharmaceuticals.19 Erythrosine exerts cytotoxic and cytostatic effects on human peripheral blood cells,13 and induces endotoxic and mutagenic effects in HepG2 cells.20 Long term erythrosine usage influences childhood behavior,21 thyroid function,22 and results in inhibition of drug-metabolizing enzymes23 and mitochondrial respiration.10,23,24

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Translate that into English, please.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Despite the fact that it's used within products consumed by children, it's relatively dangerous and proven to be so even though it's high fived by the FDA. I'm sorry. I know this shit starts to look like someone got pissed and threw a box at an ongoing game of scattergories. Basically, in even small amounts over short periods it's shown to have effects on the immune system, liver cells, and even DNA mutation (specifically with something called micronuclei-- which are like little components of DNA that are separate from the main nucleus inside of cells and are usually found in ones that cause problems-- think cancer).

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks! Do you know why that makes cherries safe, tho?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Within the US, evidently because it's less likely to "cause allergy" according to this paper. Looks like there was a big plea to keep unnaturally bright red food coloring on the market. It's an auto download, so be forewarned.

https://cspinet.org/sites/default/files/attachment/food-dyes-rainbow-of-risks.pdf

However, around the same time, Secretary of Agriculture John R. Block was pressing his counterpart at the Department of Health and Human Services not to ban the dye (Food Chemical News May 28, 1984). He wrote, “Some segments of the agricultural community are quite dependent on Red Dye #3 in the processing and marketing of certain commodities, especially canned fruits. I have assured the affected industry that their concerns would be made known to you, as well as my own concern...” And in 1989, Congress, at the behest of growers and packers, temporarily prohibited the FDA from banning the dye (Washington Post July 19, 1989). Twenty-six years later, the FDA still has not acted. The harm that Red 3, an acknowledged animal carcinogen, is likely causing far out-weighs the minor nuisance entailed in banning the dye. It is worth noting that Red 3 has been seen as invaluable by some makers of maraschino cherries, but other brands are dyed with Red 40 or (shockingly) no added coloring, and some brands (Del Monte, Giant) of canned fruit cocktail contain cherries colored with natural colorings (un-fortunately, the natural colorings used, carmine or cochineal extract, can cause severe allergic reactions). The food industry and public would survive a ban quite easily.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for the info. The news media would do well to bring this up, but instead the news for this topic is rather alarmist, and leaved a lot out, as if a team of monkees are constantly re-typing the stuff sent to them by a news server. The US FDA also doesn't bother doing its job much of the time, likely at the request of corporate lobbyists, some of whom work for the FDA. The 'Breaking' note in the title is merely facetious, beceuse the subject is pastry sprinkles, rather deadly pastry sprinkles, however.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe the cherry flavored stuff is.. you know what, I actually have no clue. The effects of it is nasty though. Neat that the US doesn't give a shit. I wonder how common it is in our foods. Gonna look.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

EU regs don't have to make sense, they just have to make jobs for bureaucrats.