you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JustLookDontDismiss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think he did the smartest decision he could because after getting that shot you're going to start having a lot of problems maybe not instantly but it's going to screw up business when you're relying on someone and they can't make it. And since a company with more than 100 people would have to force all their employees to get it or they would have to fire the employee the employees that do submit to it I believe you should be able to and there probably is a way of suing your employer after forcing you to do that, if you end up suffering because of that. The person that was being responsible for that then would be employer because without that employer you would have not have done that.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It may be a smart buisness decision but I don't think we should allow businesses to discriminate based on health risks associated with the clot shot. This was not a free choice. Especially when it becomes apparent to all the sheep that this shot is extremely harmful. We can't let them create a class system by which they will divide us.

Unfortunately businesses and society will have to absorbe this harm. And the blame needs to be placed on the ruling class. Before we punish the vaxed we need to execute every gates, Rothschild, Fauchi, pharma executive, and congressman.