you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ShalomEveryone[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (23 children)

As a lot of people already know. Back in the summer of 2020 there were white supremacists committing acts of violence while false flagging as Black Lives Matter supporters and ANTIFA. It's nice to put a name and face to a white supremacist who was foolish enough to believe that committing crimes will racially lead to something of consequence.

Shalom

✡️

[–]Tophat123 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (20 children)

No one believes this shit. But keep blaming white supremacy for everything. The countless videos that you have censored showed that far left extremists once again cause all the problems they claim to be caused by their enemies.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

The fact that every, single, solitary, one of his comments end in

Shalom

✡️

Is enough to tell you he's a left-wing shill account. Everyone should block him right away; u/Jesus already proved these kinds of people make more money the more you comment on their posts.

[–]Zapped 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I think it is the opposite. This is a troll account used to stir up debate. I think he is somewhat sarcastically commenting and trying to get people to conclude opposite of the sentiment he is throwing out there.

[–]ShalomEveryone[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Nope, you're only saying that because I am not a bigot therefore you disagree with what I have to say.

Shalom

✡️

[–]Zapped 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Your statement is bigoted.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I am not a bigot

So you agree with child rape.

[–]ShalomEveryone[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

No one believes this shit

Then why did the white supremacist admit to committing crimes false flagging as a BLM supporter? This guy is not the first one to do so. Lemme guess, Jews forced him to give a false confession. The difference between this loser and the white supremacists on reddit and saidit is that this guy had balls to actually do something besides talk a big game and engage in white supremacist circle jerks online.

Shalom

✡️

[–]wristaction 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (13 children)

He is not a "white supremacist". He is a BLMer. He admitted to firing the weapon as an earnest participant in the BLM cause and you cannot substantiate this goofy "false flag" conspiracy.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

He's definitely a white supremacist, who obviously tried to get police to react harshly to BLM protestors. It's obvious, and there are videos that show some of this in other cities. BLM protestors were certainly not motivated to cause problems for themselves by attacking cops.

[–]wristaction 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

No. You have no evidence with which to support that claim. No video. BLM made their motives and their antipathy toward cops explicit. There are days worth of recordings of BLM attacking police, including the occupation and destruction of police buildings.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

[–]wristaction 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Nah, we can check your sources.

Items one and seven are nonfacts relating to the legend of 'Umbrella Man', a protester dressed in far-left "blackbloc" garb who was recorded on video smashing the windows of an Autozone as the initial rioting in Minneapolis was just underway. The identification in the linked reports is the second failed attempt by leftwing cybersleuths to attribute Umbrella Man to some kind of "false flag" theory. Initially, they misidentified the culprit as a St. Paul police officer acting as an agent provocateur. After that, the case seemed to get cold. In the third night of rioting, Mayor Frey issued a hysterical tweet attributing all of the violence to the mafia, "white supremacists" and "foreign actors". What an embarrassment for everyone. Months later, a far-left activist published a story to Facebook about confronting a group of bikers with politically incorrect patches on their vests at a restaurant in another city. Subsequently, police received an anonymous tip identifying the mysterious Umbrella Man as one of these very restautrant-goers. The police, eager to mitigate their boss' gaffe, announced the issuance of a warrant based on the anonymous sleuth's tip. Fourteen months later, with no arrest and no charges, "Umbrella Man" remains at large.

Item two includes a screengrab which we on the right pass around to illustrate the unintentionally comedic lengths the authorities and media in these blue enclaves stretched their material in the effort sustain the "white supremacist false flag" thing. Among the mugshots of the four "white supremacist" arrestees are two white dudes with dreadlocks and a black dude. No further support for the claim is provided.

Boogaloo Boys, again, are antiracist, anti-cop libertarian anarchists who marched sympathetically with BLM in the name of the BLM cause. There is no basis to otherize them apart from the possibility that BLM is exclusively anticapitalist. Is this what you're asserting? I could direct you to video of Boogs and BLM marching together from just last month if you like.

Item four is more Authorities Say supported by absolutely nothing.

Item five pertains not to a BLM riot, but to a pro-Trump event which antfa attacked, stabbing four. Don't know why it's listed. m Must've been a mistake.

Item six is of BLMers terrorizing a passing motorist at one of their blockades.

Item seven is the legend of "Umbrella Man" again.

Put up another six. Are you familiar with the story bout the horse salesman trying to sell a giant pile of shit? He tells the guy, "You buy yourself a pile of shit this tall, there's bound to be a pony in there somewhere". Maybe your compilation of sources is like that.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

all of... ?

Indeed - not all accusations will be proven correct, but there has been sufficient evidence to show at a number of the protests armed white supremacists who were there to cause trouble and some of them to cause fires. Some of those videos I did not find with my 5 minute search, but I shouldn't have to do your research for you. You've made unsubstantiated claims that are easily debunked. As I've noted: check your sources. With regard to the issue of blacks also causing trouble: yes that also happened. But it's not that simple.

[–]wristaction 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

I haven't made any positive claims. You have. That claim is false and you've so far failed to substantiate it, which is your duty in an argument where you have asserted a positive claim. you say this should be easy, yet you appear to be experiencing difficulty with it.

[–]wristaction 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

There were not. I get that you wish there were, but you can cite no evidence to support this very silly conspiracy theory attributing BLM's neobolshevick terrorism to phantom "false flags".

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Like the fake Synagogue active shooter drill?