you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Bullshit. You want to call other people names in order for you to feel superior to them. No one gives a damn about a so-called "SJW-adjacent", nor do normal people know that it is.

Here's an argument for you: I recommend that you step away from the computer, go outside, and speak to people. You'll be amazed.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

You want to call other people names in order for you to feel superior to them.

Wow, you can read minds! That's remarkable! Say, can you do it again? Can you tell me what I had for breakfast?

No one gives a damn about a so-called "SJW-adjacent",

Yeah they do. The term is in common usage due to the SJW left popularizing the term "white-adjacent" so that they can employ racial discrimination against Asians. You see, they have the irritating habit of destroying the race hate narrative by studying hard and having strong families. Even if you're not SJW, you are at the very least SJW-adjacent. But since that little slip of the tongue of yours, we know you're full SJW.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

So I am a social justice warrior because I respond to your nonsense? Giving yourself too much credit, are you? No one cares what we think, not even the various voices in your head agree on anything. Get some fresh air, mate.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Bzzt! The answer was cereal and milk.

If you can't read people's minds, then don't tell them what they're thinking.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

If you can't read people's minds...

It's not ESP, it's logic. Look up hypothetical syllogism, where you can read about conditional forms of logic, ergo:

1) Saiditors who resort to insults and name-calling often have low self esteem and "call other people names in order to feel superior"

2) Someone insists that I am a social justice warrior (on this website with 20 people)

3) Thus the person calling me an SJW must have low self esteem and thus wants to assume that I am an evil social justice warrior because it's the only reason I would disagree with snowflakes on Saidit, as this makes said snowflakes feel superior to me.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

That's been a disproven theory. It's now thought that bullies have high self esteem, and there's more to it, but I can't find the specific article I want on Google without a bullshit paywall. I would dig more, but I'm procrastinating as it is, so I'll leave you with the seed of curiosity.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks Basghetti. Indeed, there are various reasons for bullying, one of which can be low self esteem. The main issue in this case can be: what helps bullies have a higher estimation of themselves? Would they have that higher estimation if they were not bullying? Research indicates that bullying is used by people with low emotional intelligence as a means of self actualization, thereby raising their self esteem. This is how we know that these prople have self esteem problems. As you may have seen (15 hours ago, whereas your comment is 6 hours old), I responded to Chipit with links:

https://saidit.net/s/news/comments/8bzi/white_house_defends_letting_billions_in_military/ux8r

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You are just reaching here, and you know it. Classic shill behavior. Chipit is like that with everyone.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Saiditors who resort to insults and name-calling often have low self esteem and "call other people names in order to feel superior"

Really? Could you provide us with a citation on that, oh science-worshipper? Where's your data? Sounds like more mind-reading hokum pokum to me and everyone else who knows what science means.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Do you really have no idea? Are you acting like you have no idea? Even if you've never seen or heard this, you can also manage a quick search, rather than act like you have hardly the education or life experiences to know why people insult others. People who post insults often have low self esteem, are of low intelligence, and are often fearful of the other person. It's very well known. Search: name-calling is a sign of . Here are links to get you started:

https://www.healthychildren.org/English/ages-stages/gradeschool/Pages/Signs-of-Low-Self-Esteem.aspx

https://www.gazettetimes.com/news/opinion/mailbag/letter-people-who-resort-to-name-calling-show-lack-of-intelligence-sept-30/article_87147a12-ad95-11de-aa4e-001cc4c002e0.html

https://www.inc.com/bill-murphy-jr/people-who-do-these-7-toxic-things-have-very-low-emotional-intelligence.html

https://outofthefog.website/top-100-trait-blog/2015/11/4/name-calling

https://theworldlink.com/news/opinion/mailbag/name-calling----the-final-refuge/article_ce2f1eaa-21e8-57da-8b7a-4cef2a2627ad.html

https://www.theactivetimes.com/healthy-living/habits-of-toxic-people/slide-2

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You didn't post any data from Saidit users. You're making things up. You have no data. How unscientific.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Really? You're obviously in an alternate universe.

You didn't post any data from Saidit users.

That was not at issue.

You're making things up. You have no data. How unscientific

I provided the information and resources, of which there are many. You obviously don't want to understand or address this information.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You aren't using science, or data. You're just making something up and pretending that it applies. That's not science.

Moreover, as an educated person, surely you know of the replication crisis. You don't? How humiliating for you. Allow me to educate your ignorance.

In the field of social sciences, it turns out they have been very heavily influenced by hard left politics and have been deliberately biasing their results for decades. Their results cannot be reproduced. Therefore they are not science. We are going to lose dozens of years of research down the tubes. Garbage. It will have to all be retracted because it is irreproducible. The Chinese are going to kick our asses because you think they have such ridiculous restrictions? Hell no.

All of which a supposedly pro-science person like you should have known before you posted.

I mean, come on, you believe in mind-reading for fuck's sake.