White House defends letting billions in military equipment fall into Taliban hands

submitted by Chipit from washingtonexaminer.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

does not automatically mean that the videos they provide are useless.

Yes it does. Whenever any other source lies and gets caught, it taints anything they've ever said and anything they may say in the future.

This is the precedent that the SJW and SJW-adjacent left has established. It's how Project Veritas is treated.

Remember when the BBC lied about women coding?

The BBC’s astonishing delay in retracting what was clearly a disingenuous headline, wouldn’t be so much of a problem if the story didn’t get picked up on an astronomical scale. The article went viral, getting hundreds of retweets, including by the executive chairman of Twitter himself.

Worse, a quick Google search for “women write better code” still yields 328,000,000 results, with the BBC piece on top of the list.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

Whenever any other source lies and gets caught, it taints anything they've ever said and anything they may say in the future.

So - literally EVERY news source? Can you name one news source that has never manipuated the news to their own interests? Moreover, I am critical of the BBC, for reasons noted in the link I provided at the end of my comment. Yes, they fucked up with the "women write better code", and you can offer better examples, such as all of the ridiculous support for the Tories, or for the invasion of Iraq, etc. etc.

This is the precedent that the SJW and SJW-adjacent left has established.

I don't (personally) know anyone who has any interest in this, and I've seen no evidence of it. Seems that right-wing writers like to apply SJW to people they don't like, all they while referring to Trump as the second coming of Jesus. (Not that you're diong this, but I really don't see the SJW stuff online, even if it is there.)

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

all of the ridiculous support for the Tories

BAhahaha...the BBC supports conservatives? You're even further left than I ever thought possible. When you're far left, anyone to the right of Mao Zedong looks like a fascist to you.

I don't (personally) know anyone who has any interest in this, and I've seen no evidence of it

LOL, outed yourself SJW. How would you even know?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

Why do you make comments that are obviously false?

It's apparent that you know absolutely nothing about the BBC, or about the rest of the world who know nothing about the SJW label.

Step away from the computer, go outside, and speak to people. You'll be amazed.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

You consistently defend SJW positions, which makes you at the very least SJW-adjacent. But that "I don't know anyone who has any interest in this" line was a big mistake that let the cat out of the bag. Whoops.

Step away from the computer, go outside, and speak to people. You'll be amazed.

This is a personal insult and against Saidit TOS. Use arguments instead.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Bullshit. You want to call other people names in order for you to feel superior to them. No one gives a damn about a so-called "SJW-adjacent", nor do normal people know that it is.

Here's an argument for you: I recommend that you step away from the computer, go outside, and speak to people. You'll be amazed.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

You want to call other people names in order for you to feel superior to them.

Wow, you can read minds! That's remarkable! Say, can you do it again? Can you tell me what I had for breakfast?

No one gives a damn about a so-called "SJW-adjacent",

Yeah they do. The term is in common usage due to the SJW left popularizing the term "white-adjacent" so that they can employ racial discrimination against Asians. You see, they have the irritating habit of destroying the race hate narrative by studying hard and having strong families. Even if you're not SJW, you are at the very least SJW-adjacent. But since that little slip of the tongue of yours, we know you're full SJW.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

So I am a social justice warrior because I respond to your nonsense? Giving yourself too much credit, are you? No one cares what we think, not even the various voices in your head agree on anything. Get some fresh air, mate.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Bzzt! The answer was cereal and milk.

If you can't read people's minds, then don't tell them what they're thinking.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

If you can't read people's minds...

It's not ESP, it's logic. Look up hypothetical syllogism, where you can read about conditional forms of logic, ergo:

1) Saiditors who resort to insults and name-calling often have low self esteem and "call other people names in order to feel superior"

2) Someone insists that I am a social justice warrior (on this website with 20 people)

3) Thus the person calling me an SJW must have low self esteem and thus wants to assume that I am an evil social justice warrior because it's the only reason I would disagree with snowflakes on Saidit, as this makes said snowflakes feel superior to me.