BREAKING: No, The Vaccine Is NOT FDA Approved! Not Even Close! -

submitted by Magawillrise from proudamerican.site

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]StillLessons 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The critical item here is a "BLA" (Biologics License Application) approval. Doing just a quick scan through sites to try to illuminate what the acceptance of that application means didn't yield much. Clicking through the headline here and reading the actual letter sent to Pfizer from the FDA, the writer of the above headline has a point. Regardless of the FDA calling today's act "approval", their official letter refers in several places to ongoing Emergency Use Authorization:

For example:

"The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine vial label and carton labels are clearly marked for “Emergency Use Authorization.” The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‐19 Vaccine is authorized to be distributed, stored, further redistributed, and administered by emergency response stakeholders when packaged in the authorized manufacturer packaging (i.e., vials and cartons), despite the fact that the vial and carton labels may not contain information that otherwise would be required under the FD&C Act.

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‐19 Vaccine is authorized for emergency use with the following product-specific information required to be made available to vaccination providers and recipients, respectively (referred to as “authorized labeling”):" --FDA Letter, Page 7

There are plenty of other similar references in the letter.

Good catch!

...edited to reflect conversation under raven9 comment

[–]infocom6502 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The critical item here is a "BLA" (Biologics License Application) approval. Doing just a quick scan through sites to try to illuminate what the acceptance of that application means didn't yield much.

I think your paragraph #1 is exactly on point.

In semi-related news, last month, a EU panel is advising in favor of the approval to allow doctors to write a prescription of SpikeVax™ for kids. This seems like a bad idea. Like the US, they seem to be going on outdated data for effectiveness (against vanilla variants which are not too relevant now) and rising known risks (as more injuries and deaths are reported).

I think the FDA's continued parallel use of the EUA is mostly to be able to bypass requiring a prescription from your doctor, and perhaps some secondary reasons.

Here is Dr Malone's take on this. (thx to rense.com for link)

Update:

It seems like the major reason for parallel use is that the real FDA vaccine, where the consumer has normal legal recourse for injuries, will not be available anytime in the foreseeable future. This is explained a little bit after hour 1, minute 9 in this lengthy AJ newscast. People are essentially getting tricked into thinking they are receiving the FDA vaccine, when they are instead receiving the EUA vaccine, where Pfizer holds zero legal liability, and victims (or next of kin?) will get compensated (probably not much) for injuries and death.

[–]StillLessons 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for the Malone video. That explains a lot. The dodges they create in order to uphold the fundamental lie are ever more clever, yet even so, I sense the tide may be going out for them. I hope someday Fauci faces judgement for this. The terror he has created and continues to create has established an environment of fear for billions of people. What a legacy.