you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Yin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

actually deal with the externalities they produce

That's your first mistake.

Externalities are at most 3% human-contributive when it comes to warming. Change and externalities exist irrespective of humans.

what you called "doomsday" (but actually rather likely)

Doomsday hysteria is their claim, not mine. I put "12 years to doomsday" in quotes. Idiots and impressionable kids genuinely buy into such globalist hysteria scaring them to hand over their sovereignty.

Much of South and Central America become uninhabitable.

Hilarious. You really believe such lies crafted by the world's most despicable, tyrannical political agents.

The US strains under the load of dealing with climate refugees and food shortages from crop failure

Only neoliberal NPCs don't understand labeling people "refugees" is a scam tactic of globalists to funnel billions of third-worlders into western nations to collapse western nations to the breaking point where they become ripe for converting into a one-world government. At the breaking point is where globalist lying press ramps up calls for a New World Order (by any name or label or agenda policy title) as the "solution" to manufactured suffering brought from unnatural "diversity" (intra-turmoil of clashing civilizations and crime) and intentionally induced economic stress, like pushing people over the edge with "covid passes" and accelerating mark of the beast tyranny control systems.

UN: "Replacement Migration"

UN (white genocide) Scamming:

"Stop having kids, whitey! Save the planet" vs. "Bring a billion Africans in to use-up western lifestyles!" Lunacy:

Rolled in smoothly by brainwashing morons. People are made to think the sky is falling and driven into suicidal madness over "climate change", "terrorism", hilarious statuses like "economic refugees", "save the children" emotional flashes on the screen, hyper-sensationalized "pandemic" scares, and the list never stops. This is a full active war by globalists to reach an end game of owning the world to a maximum extent and placing it into a globalist-communist-tiered tyranny you can't escape.

Canada strains to deal with Americans fleeing north. Basically, Americas = fucked.

No.

The Gulf Stream snaps, making most of Europe much colder than it is currently, again disrupting agriculture and all of the EU economy.

No.

Middle East uninhabitable.

No.

Australia is already mostly uninhabitable, a few more degrees and it'll probably just be on fire all the time.

No.

Islands in Asia go underwater, and the coastal nations get fucked by rising seas. Leaving China as pretty much the only country in Asia, with the exception of...

No.

Russia. That big ole chunk of land the locals refer to as Siberia? Well hello prime and arable farmland.

Oh, wow, sweet!

And it turns out it's rather easy to spread climate change denialism because it plays nicely with conservatives' natural desire for threats to have agency.

Your mind is brainwashed by globalist hysteria selling you manufactured panic-solutions that aren't solutions.

Their "solutions" to hyper-sensationalized "problems" are always the same Trojan Horse of the nation-destroying death machine.

A long time ago, I used to think some of what they were saying about human roles in CO2 might be true. That's until I started looking at information objectively outside of the extreme confines of globalist media and "SCIENCE!" (read: fake science) zealots who use correlation-causation fallacies and absurd statistical modeling. The climate is always changing. CO2 does not have a linear causal relationship to "greenhouse"-spurred climate; it has an exponentially diminishing relationship, to the point where the vast bulk of CO2-induced warming is from its pre-human-industrial-revolution state. The remaining post-human-industrial-revolution state doesn't change it to any significant degree. Zoom out. This is the most stable period of climate in theorized and haphazardly-measured history over millions of years. Not expecting change (irrespective of humans) would be insane.

Environmentalism has been hijacked and perverted for at least 40 years. I'd like to see people care about stopping Big-Chem-Ag-Pharma and their industrial chemicals pumped into food and bodies and food chains, but now the former so-called "environmentalists" (of the 50s and 60s and 70s and on) have been converted into servants of globalists and these globalist industries and scams deflecting all attention on themselves with the "climate change" hysteria bullshit and slapping "SCIENCE!" and "GREEN!" labels on their garbage. Hence for a decade there are Monsanto ads on (e.g.) Globalist-secular-Jewish state-based propaganda machines like "NPR" and a new crop of reddit-born neoliberals praise these globalist endeavors under the banner of "SCIENCE!" and "GREEN!". Their minds are polluted vessels, ironically. They're a mono-cultured, bio-engineered suicide crop of a cult.

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

I think your fear of globalists has blinded you to the reality of climate change, and I think you have been manipulated by their propaganda.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

the reality of climate change

Yin is too kind. Anyone who deploys that phrase in a non-joking manner is suffering from poor cognition, which allows any who wish to manipulate that poor unfortunates belief sets. It's similar to the way internet-connected computers with no protection against malware are targeted by bot-net operators. They become part of the bot-net without any self-awareness, and regularly check in with their operator to learn what to do or say next.

But "pretending" to be retarded is also the basis of a standard trolling technique, which seems to be the case here. You overplayed the stupidity of the account, in case you're wondering.

It's been months since I've seen one of its comments, but this wording and rhetoric reminds me of the socks account. Alt?

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Poor cognition, huh. So you're fine with the global corporations and the bank cabal just raping the earth and hording its wealth, while leaving us to rot. Cool. Very good cognition of you.

Or have your leaders convinced you to believe that in the name of "owning the libs!!!"?

But "pretending" to be retarded is also the basis of a standard trolling technique

I take it you're experienced? Teach me, senpai

Alt?

Believe it or not, more than one person in the world hasn't drank your Kool aid yet.

[–]Yin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Globalists own both sports teams including the Poser "Environmentalist" team you're probably pretending to be on.

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Okay. And your solution is?

Microplastics have broken through the placenta barrier, dude. Y'all out here worried about vaccines when we have LITERAL PLASTIC inside DEVELOPING FETUSES. We don't have time for this pussyfoot shit.

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    What do you think should be done to combat microplastics?

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      outside of overhauling the immoral owners of Finance

      So it sounds like Solution A is revolution. Fair.

      ≥the naive answer is to seek reduction and filtering of microplastics. Punish nations, industries, and people most behind infecting food chains and force (with respect to scale) changes in industrial behavior

      And Solution B fits within existing legal structures, but you refer to it as "naive". Why is that? Is it not more realistically achievable?

      If someone is a proponent of Solution B, do you consider them a poser environmentalist?