you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (19 children)

I think your fear of globalists has blinded you to the reality of climate change, and I think you have been manipulated by their propaganda.

[–]Yin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

You are incorrect.

I examine what globalists do and report on it and I expose people such as yourself.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

ANYONE dies. Except for "watery" ppl. like i am. But thanks for you exemplifying this fact.

Once i almost drowned in the Carribian and then Dolphins came.

Soon i was in Cuba. Which wasn't a problem for me. Cuban authorities are friendly.

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Let's try a different tack.

People for whom climate change denialism is a very good and convenient thing: * Big oil * Big agriculture * Global freight/shippers * Most major manufacturers * Global finance/Fintech * The military industrial complex

Your theory supposes the existence of "globalist elites" who... DON'T intersect with any of the above groups? Who the fuck are they then?

The people in power want you to deny climate change. It's so much easier for them! They get to keep fucking us!

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    real environmentalism that would involve actually going against globalist industries (pharma, chem, ag) that cause real pollution

    Tell me about this. Because that's what I'm talking about, but it sounds like you're saying I only think I'm talking about this.

    playing a global and powerful game stroking emotions and exploiting people's desire for virtue

    This is what I posit you have fallen victim to. But tell me what "real environmentalism" is and I'll withhold that judgment for now.

    [–]Yin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    You are a poser as in a fraudulent "environmentalist". That's what I'm talking about.

    [–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Ok, then what is real environmentalism? If you can't answer this, I'll have to assume you've just been trolling.

    [–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

    the reality of climate change

    Yin is too kind. Anyone who deploys that phrase in a non-joking manner is suffering from poor cognition, which allows any who wish to manipulate that poor unfortunates belief sets. It's similar to the way internet-connected computers with no protection against malware are targeted by bot-net operators. They become part of the bot-net without any self-awareness, and regularly check in with their operator to learn what to do or say next.

    But "pretending" to be retarded is also the basis of a standard trolling technique, which seems to be the case here. You overplayed the stupidity of the account, in case you're wondering.

    It's been months since I've seen one of its comments, but this wording and rhetoric reminds me of the socks account. Alt?

    [–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

    Poor cognition, huh. So you're fine with the global corporations and the bank cabal just raping the earth and hording its wealth, while leaving us to rot. Cool. Very good cognition of you.

    Or have your leaders convinced you to believe that in the name of "owning the libs!!!"?

    But "pretending" to be retarded is also the basis of a standard trolling technique

    I take it you're experienced? Teach me, senpai

    Alt?

    Believe it or not, more than one person in the world hasn't drank your Kool aid yet.

    [–]Yin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    Globalists own both sports teams including the Poser "Environmentalist" team you're probably pretending to be on.

    [–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    Okay. And your solution is?

    Microplastics have broken through the placenta barrier, dude. Y'all out here worried about vaccines when we have LITERAL PLASTIC inside DEVELOPING FETUSES. We don't have time for this pussyfoot shit.

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      What do you think should be done to combat microplastics?

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        outside of overhauling the immoral owners of Finance

        So it sounds like Solution A is revolution. Fair.

        ≥the naive answer is to seek reduction and filtering of microplastics. Punish nations, industries, and people most behind infecting food chains and force (with respect to scale) changes in industrial behavior

        And Solution B fits within existing legal structures, but you refer to it as "naive". Why is that? Is it not more realistically achievable?

        If someone is a proponent of Solution B, do you consider them a poser environmentalist?