Colorado Professor Claims That 'White Supremacy' is Causing Black People to Attack Asians

submitted by [deleted] from thegatewaypundit.com

all 12 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

White supremacy does not require a white person to perpetuate it.

wut

there was an uptick of attacks on Asians, again, primarily by black people, because of “the white supremacist ideas of Chinese people being to blame for COVID-19.”

Sooooo ... black people attacked asian people, and it's because the white boogeymen supremacists told them to?

Goddamn, apparently black people have no agency or state of mind, according to "a critical race studies and ethnic studies professor at the University of Colorado-Boulder".

[–]AnarchySpeach 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Change the definition of words.

This lets you control words.

Never be wrong again.

Nobody can use logic against you because logic requires the use of words containing definitions.

This is also why these racist-woke-morons hate math so damn much. They can't fight it. They can't change the definitions of numbers. Expect them to attack the institutions teaching math and physics. The less people understand numbers, the less threats there are to their control.

When they say "The Whites caused x" they don't mean white people. They mean the current system of western philosophy. They changed the definition of white and racist in order to speak nonsense freely without risk of logical debate.

[–]StillLessons 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

This is why having a knowledge of what Orwell pointed out decades ago matters.

The entire foundation of BLM is a definition of the word "racism" that has nothing at all to do with race or skin color, but with people they don't agree with. If you disagree with them ideologically, that is their definition of racist.

You cannot "debate" pure narcissism. They don't recognize any thought that disagrees with them as legitimate.

I'm honestly at a loss to know how to deal with a group of people who have rejected civilized negotiation and debate. It makes democracy impossible, literally.

[–]ripelivanianbeets 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

White people are better than bl*cks, which makes bl*cks chimp out and attack asians, who are also better than bl*cks.

You can call it White supremacy if you want, but really it's more just bl*ck inferiority.

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    Calm your tits and walk away from the keyboard, socks. Jesus, this place is like walking through a layer of hell tonight.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Good point - I've deleted it. But it's a genuine request.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I think I said it while driving today a minimum of three times. Best not to have it in text though.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Regarding your second request, you link to my response to someone who deleted his/her statement. And I do not remember that other person's comments. I should not comment on the item you mention because it's out of context, when the item I referred to is deleted.

      In general - regardless of what the professor is saying - the problem I am addressing in several comments in that thread, and that others have addressed, regarding responses to BLM, is that the context is important. Many of these responses to BLM, including comments link 'White Lives Matter' or 'All Lives Matter', is that the significance of each statement depends on its context. The statements are not themselves important, or even false, if taken out of context. The message is important, and the message is that the context should be considered. Thus, the actual message of the phrase, Black Lives Matter is its context, not the simple and obvious fact that their lives matter.

      [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      XD

      [–]Sonofzeus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      True, it’s pure resentment. It’s so obvious and hard to not see- even for a brainwashed leftoid, though they’ll never admit it out loud.

      [–]filbs111 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      What's the real answer here? Do asians get attacked more than whites, or is it just that "asian hate" is a topical narrative?

      If they do get attacked more, are people singling them out for abuse, or is it that they're more likely to live near high crime areas?

      [–]GConly 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      A critical race studies and ethnic studies professor at the University of Colorado-Boulder is continuing to spread the lie that “white supremacy” is causing black people to attack Asians.

      Woke idiot too dumb to get a real degree insists white people are the reason black Americans commit race hate crimes against Asians.