you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]christnmusicreleases[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Put on ten masks for 100% efficiency to block all possible contact with droplets, and die of asphyxiation.

[–]VirgilGriff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's telling that you have to resort to an absurd conclusion in order to defend your argument

[–]christnmusicreleases[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

CDC Walks Back Claim…Now Says People With Vaccination Can Still Get Wuhan Virus…So Why Bother? Don’t wear a mask. Wear a mask. Wear one mask. Wear two masks. The virus spreads on surfaces. The virus doesn’t spread on surfaces. Stand 6 feet apart. You only need to stand 3 feet apart. Kids shouldn’t play sports. Kids can play non-contact sports with masks. Kids can play contact sports but must wear a mask. Then they suggested a five-layer mask. Next, will be ten. Wear the whole effing box. It's a logical progression. This isn't about health, it's about submission. There's no scientific basis for any of these guidelines whatsoever. It's a smokescreen to get everyone in on a social credit system, global communitarianism.

[–]VirgilGriff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I asked you specific claims about masks, droplet size, the way that influenza and other long-known viruses have been known to spread, and each time you deflect and take a shit all over yourself.

Do you have any capacity to actually address the flaws I pointed out in your argument? I could point out flaws in your current one, but you'd just switch topics again.

Masks are primarily effective by stopping respiratory droplets that contain viruses, not loose viral particles themselves (though even then electorstatic interactions seem to help, for some materials).

Vaccines build resistance by triggering an immune response to an inactivated virus or to the viral spike protein--do you know what that means and why I keep referring to it? Show me that you're capable of having this discussion.