I asked you specific claims about masks, droplet size, the way that influenza and other long-known viruses have been known to spread, and each time you deflect and take a shit all over yourself.

Do you have any capacity to actually address the flaws I pointed out in your argument? I could point out flaws in your current one, but you'd just switch topics again.

Masks are primarily effective by stopping respiratory droplets that contain viruses, not loose viral particles themselves (though even then electorstatic interactions seem to help, for some materials).

Vaccines build resistance by triggering an immune response to an inactivated virus or to the viral spike protein--do you know what that means and why I keep referring to it? Show me that you're capable of having this discussion.