all 4 comments

[–]Fruktig 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Women have miscarriages at some rate during pregnancy, vaccine or no vaccine.

All this actively misleading blog post does is show that by March 7 a lot more (pregnant) women had received the vaccine than by Jan 27/28. Duh...

It does not even attempt to show whether miscarriages happened at a higher rate with those who had received the vaccine compared to those who hadn't.

[–]IridescentAnaconda 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed, the miscarriage rate was not normalized to vx rate: shitty epidemiology. I do think there is the potential of great harm to unborn fetuses and if I were a pregnant woman I would wait until at least after childbirth (maybe even after breastfeeding) before accepting the vx. Misleading stats like this only hurt the cause of people who are advocating for caution.

[–]Bigs 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]Nemacolin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So how many women got the vaccine six weeks ago?