you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]terminal_sigma 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

google always pre-dates shit like that for news articles that it indexes. don't use google.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

google always pre-dates shit like that for news articles that it indexes. don't use google

Do you have a source for this claim?

[–]bobbobbybob 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

maybe the last 200 times somebody got all excited about a google search timestamp that didn't stand up to scrutiny

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Is that a source?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Is that a source?

Exactly.

It's possible that Google has recently began predating news, but this would cause many additional issues.

They actually removed the date-range searching feature a while back. I didn't realize they put it back.

Google is a NWO intel operation. This may explain why they removed it, and redeployed it.

Google's not our friend.

Most people don't realize this feature could be used for this.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)