all 6 comments

[–]Node 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Warning labels seems like a poor alternative to just not offering substandard products in the first place.

[–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

great! makes it easier to not support them.

I wonder how long before shoppers have to show diversity of producer in their shopping baskets or face fines

[–]bjam27 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It won't be diversity, it'll be forced quotas.

[–]Tarrock 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm LGBT now since I'm SuperStraight

[–]BadSprocket 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I like this. I get to support who I want, and pass on who I don't.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Couldn't you just say you're bisexual and they'd have to believe you, even if you're in a straight marriage? That's really easy to manipulate...

The labels will inform customers about items from companies that are women-, Black-, Asian-Indian-, Hispanic-, LGBT-, Asian-Pacific- or veteran-owned.

That last one's actually a pretty good idea, but the rest... not so much. I bet the Klan loves this, though, since it makes it easier for them to only buy from companies owned by Whites.