you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (16 children)

All hail supreme leader of fraud, lies, rape, hatred, racism, insurrectionists, gravy seals, and face fucking the 99% with disinformation about the gleaning of every last cent for their healthcare, Social Security, environment, clean water, education, postal services, international security, etc. etc. The worst president, alongside Bush Jr, Jackson, Hoover, Harding, & Johnson (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-worst-president-obama-economist-poll-b1801294.html)

[–]hydr0lyze 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (15 children)

I know what you mean. He's been the supreme leader in preventing rape and racism, eliminating fraud and seeing through lies, denouncing insurrectionists, and exposing all the disinformation going around.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

The old - he's not a fraud, you're a fraud - response. It's pathetic. Get the Republican penises out of our mouth long enough to develop your own voice.

[–]plopper 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Socks your going off script, less insults more disinformation bro!

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How would you know anything, with your one-day-old account? Watch and learn, homie.

[–]hydr0lyze 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You know what's pathetic? You're bringing us down the pyramid of debate, a hallmark of Saidit. :)

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Alright then:

I provided the "Central Point Refutation" (explicitly refutes the central point)

After this, you could post a 'Refutation' (finds mistakes and explains why, using citations)

Or if not that, perhaps a bit lower on the pyramid: a 'Counter-Argument' (contradictions backed up with reasoning and/or supporting evidence)

But, nooooo, you go for, 'Contradiciton' (opposing case with little or no supporting evidence)

To that, I offered a 'Counter-Argument'

Continuing down the pyramid could have included a tone response, an ad hominem, or name-calling.

[–]specialsauces 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Some know how to criticize the president, but if they had to walk in the president's shoes they would piss and shit themselves before they get their shoes laced up in the morning.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I am surprised people have this impression. Trump has been involved in the same approaches to fraud since the time he managed his first apartment complex. People at that level of corruption are much the same as they were before. He has a large team doing the rest of the work, writing speeches, keeping a list of incendiary texts &c. All he has to do is read the commands. It's not that challenging, especially for conmen like himself.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I am surprised people have this impression

The only thing Trump is good at is showmanship. He knows how to win an audience WWE style.

Oh shit, an Amy Schumer commercial for mayo just came on. How incredibly fitting for her. Surprisingly, she didn't talk about her vagina once.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The ad is probably edited, thus missing the comment about the mayo between her legs whilst watching the Superbowl.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

If only you would apply the same judgement against Democrats, maybe you'd get somewhere. Biden and Trump are both nasty perverts, and you are blind if you don't see that.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Right wing propaganda of Biden being nice to people (perhaps a bit too friendly in some cases, but not anything near grabbing them by the pussy friendly) does not constitute evidence of him being a 'nasty pervert'.

I do criticize Democrats.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Dude, if a stranger grabs your kids like that, and you LET THEM, you have an issue. If your daughter clearly tries to pull away from an older man, and that older man moves in closer, and YOU DO NOTHING, then you have an issue. This is why you are transparent.

You criticize democrats in the same way Trumpists criticize Republicans. Literally, in the exact same way. You make lame excuses which do not match the reality of how politics works behind closed doors.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It wasn't as serious as the video indicated, and it doesn't confirm that he's a nasty pervert.

Democrats claim that they're working for the 99% and at time enact legislation that proves is. Now that they can make a difference, they had better. Executive orders and approaches thus far are only attempts to return to some form of normal government. This could take a while.

Republicans have have focused their support on the 1% since the time of Reagan. There is nothing redeemable about most of them, and certainlly nothing redeemable about Trump. They've been gleaning everything possible from the 99%.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I do not support Republicans, don't mention them as if I do. Any criticism of that party you make, and I'm likely to agree. You simply ignore the Democrats and the equal amount of corruption that is evident on their side. Literally, to be at their level, you have to play by the same rules as everyone else. Get this through your head.

I have seen it happen. You deny reality for some reason.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Occasionally I add a parenthetical statement noting - 'and some Democrats'. I am not a fan of NeoLiberalism which is what I think caused the Democrats to fail during much of the Obama administration, and caused Obama not to fight for traditionally Democrat causes in the last 6 years. I was annoyed with Carter's micromanaging. Clinton's bargains with the GOP deregulated Wallstreeet, killed much of the welfare system (some of which had to go), created a for-profit prison industry that has been a disaster, for the most part, and helped develop radical Islamists in the M.E., ruined the M.E. peace process, supported the exponential growth of the lobbying industry in DC and money in politics, and other serious problems that would get Bush Jr elected and develop radical Republicanism.

In any event, my responses to Republican disinformation and misinformation often criticises the Republicans because I am referring to the source of the disinformation and misinformation. I could start criticism like this with, "I know some of the Democrats are complicit in this, but...."