RAND PAUL: If Anybody Should Be Impeached, It Should Be Chuck Schumer

submitted by MarcoPolo from headlineusa.com

all 60 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Nemacolin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (55 children)

What is up with the Paul family anyway?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (54 children)

Another flavor of Radical Republican, Libertarians like Ron and Rand built careers as the supposed outsider candidates for the people, but happen to support a much more selfish version of the Radical Republican agenda to reduce government (thus increase corporate control), reduce taxes (only for the 1%), reduce regulation (let corporations fuck everything), and focus on free speech (may the loudest assholes be the only ones we hear). Libertarians thus don't help anyone, and are nonetheless cucks for the Republican rape and pilaging of the US. Rand plans to run for president it seems, and will use the Trump admin strategy to post daily alarming disinformation and misinformation. It worked before; might work again.

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

But hey man, legal weed!

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That there seems to be a bipartisan (tripartisan?) policy. :-)

[–]Nemacolin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think you mean trilateralist.

[–]hetisachoice 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If by "legal" you mean "regulated so much that only the same Italian mafia who took over businesses in redlined neighborhoods and turned them into one liquor store after another can afford the regulatory fees," then you are technically correct.

[–]hetisachoice 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (34 children)

the Republican rape and pilaging of the US.

The US is a whore of European imperialism who had it coming.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (33 children)

Seems you're confused

[–]hetisachoice 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (32 children)

Nope, I have never been more lucid.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (31 children)

Hope you will feel better

[–]hetisachoice 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (30 children)

STFU bootlicker

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (29 children)

Calm down.

What is het?

[–]hetisachoice 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (28 children)

STFU breeder bootlicker

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

Do you know any other words?

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Dude, Rand should be impeached for being part of an incorporated congress; he being traded on the B and E database, lol, and Schumer is a slimy Zionist who was funded by the racist supremacist Falic family.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Eugenics congresses 101

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Hey look everyone. It's another duplicitous post from a fascist sympathizer who wishes to further the reach of a illegitimate totalitarian regime. Notice how he calls them "Radical Republicans." No mention of the six month terror campaign waged by Democrats all over the nation though. Notice how he conflates RINOS with libertarians. Like people aren't becoming painfully aware of how the oligarchs employ a unified front against the 99%. I guess he's still stuck in the red/blue paradigm.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Referring to someone criticising fascists as if they were themselves Democrat fascists who are criticising the Republican fascists is idiotic.

[–]hetisachoice 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

"Republican fascist" is an oxymoron because fascism is of the left. Mussolini was a leftist.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

It's not so complicated that you need a century-old example

[–]hetisachoice 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

It's more recent than using the ramblings of a 19th century German layabout to justify state seizure of private property, state theft of income via taxation, and an illegal and immoral military occupation.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Now you appear to refer to Republican approaches since Reagan.

[–]hetisachoice 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Nope, that's referring to what the slave party is doing right fucking now, bootlicker.

[–]Minedwe 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Holy autism. Only in America does a lolbert and a shitlib fight over "who's the fascist" and blaming Mussolini on each other. Such cuckoldry.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Radical Republicans were abolitionists. They assassinated Lincoln because he wanted to 'expel blacks' from the US and 'set them free,' whereas the radicals knew that technology was catching up and they didn't need slaves doing the planting and picking. They wanted wage slaves instead that had to house and feed themselves,,,, JUST SAYING.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I certainly didn't know any of this. I was thinking of post-Eisenhower developments that shifed 'conservative' approaches of the 50s and 60s to 'radical' approaches that weren't very conservative during the Reagan admin. Republicans before Eisenhower were a different kettle of fish.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Sure, you could call that radicalism in a sense. Reagan was the complete opposite of a conservative with republican principals. He literally appointed dozens of Trotskyite communist neocons. Nonetheless, the radical republicans were known in the 19th century as a 5th column of bankers and corporate lawyers aligned with foreign powers to impsoe permanent public debt, which is what we have today. Credit being passed off as money.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed

[–]SilenceThem_Consume 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is there a way we can impeach every politician and just be done with it? Fuck both these parties.

[–]dissidentrhetoric 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Rand Paul 2024, drain the swamp!

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you impeach a president not a senator genius

[–]Minedwe 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Cuck Jewmer BTFO