you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

You have to figure out if the source of information has a Jew, race traitor, or POC is involved.

Not just any Jew, a Jewess known mostly for promoting trans kids. "Trans kids" isn't science.

I know about the guy who came up with DNA. Scientists sometimes let their political beliefs overcome their science.

Especially scientists in the liberal West. They're not allowed to challenge the egalitarian dogma. China, though, isn't hamstrung by the same sort of political correctness, and their scientists are leading in the study of human biodiversity.

Neanderthals were different for real.

Why? If Neanderthals were still around, they would be just another race. We managed to have fertile hybrids with them, right? That would suggest that they cannot be a separate species. Even today, interracial pairings have reduced fertility, but they are capable of producing fertile offspring nonetheless.

Perhaps Neanderthals were the inferior beings?

This is pure speculation.

And white people are the most Neanderthal of all people.

Actually, it's been suggested that Middle Easterners have much more Neanderthal DNA (10-20%) than other humans.

African Americans are 23% Eupean because their slave masters raped them.

I'm not sure that that's why.

There hasn't been enough time for any significant evolutionary difference.

This is just straight-up false. Entire breeds of dogs have been created within the last 100 years.

We only have superficial differences such as eye color.

https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-11-16

See Figure 1: many traits related to the brain/nervous system (pituitary gland development, neural tube patterning, hindbrain development, neuron differentiation, etc.) display more variation than pigmentation does.

And genetic diversity among Africans far surpases the gentic diversity of non-Africans.

So?

Most human beings in the world are a subset of African DNA plus some remnants of Neanderthal DNA. The vast majority of homosapien pre-history takes place in Africa.

Out-of-Africa is based in ideology. It is just as easy to develop a theory of human origins in Asia (as China does) or anywhere else. It's arbitrary to a great degree, and will likely remain pure speculation for many more years.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

How long does it take learn enough your strange misinformation to become the sort of race realist you consider yourself to be? Is the equivalent of a bachelor's degree?

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

13 50

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you are going to smear bull shit, go with the stinkiest. 13/90