Solar power required for all new California homes on Jan. 1
submitted 3 years ago by Rose421 from (mercurynews.com)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Sw0rdofDam0cles 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago* (1 child)
Seems the Mercury news dislikes my use of advertisement blocking. No matter, there's always an archive alternative.
Skimming the article, this doesn't look all bad on the face of things requiring new homes being built to include solar panels, but the numbers they're quoting regarding the benefit for the buyer don't appear to inspire much enthusiasm in my mind. Also, how much are the various taxes likely to rise as people migrate out of California.
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
Ironically, I can access this website with my adblocker enabled, but I can't access your link on my browser no matter what I do. As with all of these archive clones, they block browsers other than Firefox.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Sw0rdofDam0cles 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)