you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ReeferMadness 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

You only need enough fraud to make up the difference.

[–]Nemacolin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The difference is seven million votes.

[–]ReeferMadness 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They wouldn't be doing it if they 1. Didn't have to and 2. Couldn't make a difference. That you didn't find every single instance of fraud does not mean it doesn't exist. The biggest scandal is why we are not prosecuting people and not banning dominion voting machines.

[–]HighGuy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

More than 80 judges have had a chance to see evidence of fraud and have said there is no fraud. The lawyers didn't even claim fraud in their arguments.

Either there was no fraud, or the lawyers that Trump counted on to secure his win were completely incompetent. Kinda makes you question the type of person who would choose that kind of representation.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The lawyers didn't even claim fraud in their arguments.

That's only because they couldn't prove fraud.