Former Twitter CEO says some capitalists 'going to be the first' to be 'shot in the revolution'

submitted by sproketboy from (foxbusiness.com)

all 23 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 3 fun -  (13 children)

What he means by "capitalists" is small business owners. This isn't about Capital vs Labor, this is about top vs bottom. People like him have been funding far-left terrorists, and who have they attacked? Small business-owners and working people!

The upper classes have begun their war against the lower classes! If we wish to survive we must unite against the Marxist threat — with the Nation as our vanguard, and Morality as our leader!

Capitalism and Socialism are ruled by the same masters. Reject these materialist ideologies and seek one which truly represents the People!

Don't fall into the trap of Capital vs Labor, Bourgeoisie vs Proletariat! This is a manufactured crisis between manufactured classes, by those who wish to destroy our Nation! You can read more about the true classes here or alternatively here if you would prefer audio. (Shameless plug, but I've already written about this before).

[–]Jesus 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

He isn't a capitalist, he is a corporatist. radical individualism for the middle and loweer class, corporate welfare for his class.

People like him have been funding far-left terrorists, and who have they attacked? Small business-owners and working people!

They are not even left, for they can be right of the spectrum also. They are just people who are paid in strategy of tension operations.

The upper classes have begun their war against the lower classes! If we wish to survive we must unite against the Marxist threat — with the Nation as our vanguard, and Morality as our leader!

Yes, of course, because the lower and middle classes are wakign up.

survive we must unite against the Marxist threat — with the Nation as our vanguard, and Morality as our leader!

We must unite against their threat, whatever it may be and where it may emulate from. They can pick and choose and fund who the next scapegoat is. For instance, most socialists such as Proudhon believed that Marx and Marxism was simply used to destroy countries and worker rights. Marx was a cousin of a Rothschild. Marxism is socialism with the agenda of communism. Socialsm can be marxism but it also can be opposed to marxism. Farmer co-ops are socialistic.

The point is Lenin and Trotsky were saying all the right things to the peasants in Russia. The Tsar wanted an empire and in it's latter years it started to turn on the common person. When the Bolsheviks finally got into power, with, curiously, capitalist banker money in hand, they turned on the peasants and laborer, murdering tens of thousands.

Many of the Bolsheviks were Jews, but not all Jews are Bolsheviks and certainly not all Bolsheviks are Jews. But if we look deeper into all of this, their are religious conotations of Edom, Amaleks, Purim, and Esau. That is to, like Mossad exclaims, Rise and Kill.

by those who wish to destroy our Nation!

It was destroyed 150+ years ago. They control it now. If they wanted to destroy it, it would only be to encourage the multilateral economic order. Which means creating a half-baked welfare state.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

He isn't a capitalist, he is a corporatist. radical individualism for the middle and loweer class, corporate welfare for his class.

Corporatism is inherently collectivist, anti-Capitalist, and anti-Marxist. Crony Capitalism is perhaps the best term to use here and generally aligns with your description.

They are not even left, for they can be right of the spectrum also

Yes, I'm a radical centrist and not too fond of either side, but I was specifically referring to BLM and Antifa who've been rioting for the past few months.

Marxism is socialism with the agenda of communism. Socialsm can be marxism but it also can be opposed to marxism.

I generally define Marxism as the application of Marxist-Communist principles to political and social life. It doesn't even have to be socialist: you can have Marxist Capitalism, and we do, it's called Neo-Liberalism. It's been the ideological foundation of the Democratic Party, and many other similar parties, for decades now.

I agree that Socialism and Marxism are not equatable, though I do still find Socialism to be my enemy — just as I find Capitalism to be my enemy. Materialism has always been the enemy of the People, and must be entirely eradicated in whatever form it may take. Marxism is, of course, the greater enemy.

When the Bolsheviks finally got into power, with, curiously, capitalist banker money in hand, they turned on the peasants and laborer, murdering tens of thousands.

I remember reading a quote from Lenin or Stalin that the Capitalists would sell the Bolsheviks the ropes they use to hang them. Almost every time, the far-left is supported by the Capitalist establishment, but becomes uncontrollable and proceeds to destroy said establishment, before then becoming it.

Many of the Bolsheviks were Jews, but not all Jews are Bolsheviks and certainly not all Bolsheviks are Jews.

I'll note that while many Bolsheviks where Jews, that Stalin was notoriously anti-Semitic — something the left loves to hide, for it counters their narrative that Communism is never racist — and even deported many Jews to Siberia.

It was destroyed 150+ years ago.

America is not yet dead! They may have seized the reigns of government, degenerated the youth, and waged war against our culture — but our Nation has not died! A Nation is a People, and our People still lives — under the oppression of the Marxists, but in defiance!

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

BLM and Antifa who've been rioting for the past few months.

BLM was merely a protest movement, it has been subverted, and useful idiots are running amuck within its ranks. I'm sure strategy of tension operations are being conducted on the group so as to discredit them completely. ANTIFA received Open Society funds, Trump also received Soros funds as did Kushner. Again, ANTIFA is probably full to the brim with agent provocateurs creating chaos and fights.

I generally define Marxism as the application of Marxist-Communist principles to political and social life. It doesn't even have to be socialist: you can have Marxist Capitalism, and we do, it's called Neo-Liberalism. It's been the ideological foundation of the Democratic Party, and many other similar parties, for decades now.

Agreed here. As for the GOP party, it is full to the brim with neoconservatives who came from Trotskyism.

Materialism has always been the enemy of the People, and must be entirely eradicated in whatever form it may take. Marxism is, of course, the greater enemy.

Yes, and consumerism, in largely a retail economy due to presidents selling it off to foreign investors, is the bullet of any sort of decency. We must want things, and if we want to save and stop consuming things, our economy will collapse.

I remember reading a quote from Lenin or Stalin that the Capitalists would sell the Bolsheviks the ropes they use to hang them.

Yup, Solzhenitsyn used that quote as well. Capitalism worked hand-in-hand with propping up Marxism so as to create an easily exploitable manufacturing hub.

Almost every time, the far-left is supported by the Capitalist establishment, but becomes uncontrollable and proceeds to destroy said establishment, before then becoming it.

Yes, but I believe these far-leftists, whoever they may be, are there to destroy the establishment, in order to then prop it back up. Is there not a way that we can have change and justice in such an insane system of corruption without a full-blown violent bloody revolution. And it is clear, through reading Solzhenitsyn's books, that the people had enough with the empire building of the Tsar. Tsarist Russia was not a beacon of freedom and liberty in its final years. That is precisely why so many peasants and laborers fell for the Bolshevik narrative. The Mensheviks, and many other parties still believed that the Tsar should stay in power, but the Bolsheviks, many of its leaders being funded by American capitalist bankers, sought to destroy Russia and the Tsar and then genocide the Cossacks and Russian people. Look into Lenin's Bolshevik Jewish parties and them persecuting, albeit not to the same extent as the Christians, Hasidic orthodox Jews.

I'll note that while many Bolsheviks where Jews, that Stalin was notoriously anti-Semitic — something the left loves to hide, for it counters their narrative that Communism is never racist — and even deported many Jews to Siberia.

'200 Years Together' by Alexander Solzhenitsyn illustrates that many Jews were behind the Bolsheviks, for they were treated poorly by the Tsars. That is that they were refused to hold any office within the government or in trade, despite the Hasidic Jews being prominent in alcohol trade and various schemes.

I have a 10 part post about the Jews within the Bolshevik and Cheka ranks. And it is a lie to say Stalin was anti-Semitic, Jews still held office in his ranks and he appointed many. His great purge wasn't because of his hatred for Jews, which he never had, for decrees written by Lenin throughout the USSR were still upheld under Stalin calling for the execution of those deemed anti-Semitic.

Rather, the purge was Stalin's paranoia concerning the old Bolsheviks, the Trotskyists in particular, many of whom were Jews, who had a different idea of communism and world revolution. There are various papers illustrating the ethnicity of the Bolsheviks in the early stages of the coup. I believe in 1918 -1921, of the 557 members in high ranking office, 447 were Jews. So, it would only make sense that when Stalin conducted the red purge that many of them were Jews, but this purge was based on ideology, NOT ethnicity.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

BLM was merely a protest movement, it has been subverted, and useful idiots are running amuck within its ranks. I'm sure strategy of tension operations are being conducted on the group so as to discredit them completely. ANTIFA received Open Society funds, Trump also received Soros funds as did Kushner. Again, ANTIFA is probably full to the brim with agent provocateurs creating chaos and fights.

I agree entirely, but at this point both BLM and Antifa are Communist organizations in the service of the Chinese Communist Party.

I'm not very fond of Trump, and think he's enabling Antifa either because, as you said: he's taking money from the same hand, or because it allows him to blame Biden and sell himself as a law and order candidate that will end the riots — even though he could, and should, have invoked the Insurrection Act.

As for the GOP party, it is full to the brim with neoconservatives who came from Trotskyism.

Neoconservatives are mostly just traditional Liberals, just as bad as the Democrats, and just as corrupt too. Technically I'm also a Neoconservative, but I'm specifically a Progressive-Conservative — which is much different, but still holds the core values of Conservatism.

Yes, and consumerism, in largely a retail economy due to presidents selling it off to foreign investors, is the bullet of any sort of decency. We must want things, and if we want to save and stop consuming things, our economy will collapse.

I agree. Our economy should be people-focused, not item-focused. Also, ideologies that focus around an entire class (most Americans belong to the Consumer class) always become divisive. As for Consumerism, it alienates the Workers, who've for quite some time now have been rebelling against the status quo. Not in any real capacity, but with the right leadership they could become a force to be reckoned with. It also pits the Consumers against higher classes whenever there's a shortage, since they tend to control the supply-chain and receive their share first.

Capitalism worked hand-in-hand with propping up Marxism so as to create an easily exploitable manufacturing hub.

Exactly like what they're doing with Antifa and BLM. You'd think they would've learned their lesson by now, since nearly every time this has resulted in revolution, but you can't expect materialists to be able to comprehend anything beyond immediate gratification.

Yes, but I believe these far-leftists, whoever they may be, are there to destroy the establishment, in order to then prop it back up.

That's the intention, yes.

And it is a lie to say Stalin was anti-Semitic, Jews still held office in his ranks and he appointed many. His great purge wasn't because of his hatred for Jews, which he never had, for decrees written by Lenin throughout the USSR were still upheld under Stalin calling for the execution of those deemed anti-Semitic.

Stalin deported Jews to Siberia based solely upon their ethnicity, and had a constant paranoia that they where going to assassinate him. Yes, many Jews where in government, but there's nothing a Jew hates more than another Jew. And also: Marxism is based upon double-standards. They don't care about consistency. It's similar the how BLM view white people: they hate us unless we entirely submit to their cause.

Rather, the purge was Stalin's paranoia concerning the old Bolsheviks, the Trotskyists in particular, many of whom were Jews, who had a different idea of communism and world revolution.

Yes, I wasn't referring to the purge here, but rather merely the deportation of Jews outside the party. Jew in the party had a certain degree of protection — so long as they aligned with the dictator ideologically.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I agree entirely, but at this point both BLM and Antifa are Communist organizations in the service of the Chinese Communist Party.

Doubtful, for I have listened to many members of BLM speak about how we should bar any foreign military from training our domestic police, such as the IDF. Many of the leaders of BLM are well educated and explain their solutions quite well. The useful idiots in or not in the ranks of BLM are merely uneducated violent thugs mixed in with ANTIFA. It has nothing to do with China. If anything, Trump and the Zionists are funding strategy of tension operations o combat BLM. That isn;t to say that their are racist thugs on both sides of the conflict causing chaos.

I'm not very fond of Trump, and think he's enabling Antifa either because, as you said: he's taking money from the same hand, or because it allows him to blame Biden and sell himself as a law and order candidate that will end the riots.

Agreed.

Neoconservatives are mostly just traditional Liberals, just as bad as the Democrats, and just as corrupt too. Technically I'm also a Neoconservative, but I'm specifically a Progressive-Conservative — which is much different, but still holds the core values of Conservatism.

No, not really. Classical Liberals have nothing to do with the neoconservative doctrine. The neocons in their formation were originally secular Trotskyist Jews from NY, that is precisely why they opposed Stalin. Their doctrine is Straussian and they believe that in order to hold a society together an enemy must be manufactured and noble lies must be propagandized forever. They were originally communists but switched over to the right-wing Libertardian side when the left started to attack Zionism in the 60's. So, the neoconservatives are neither new nor conservative. They are Machiavellian Zionists that push democracy in neology only for Israel's sake.

Stalin deported Jews to Siberia based solely upon their ethnicity, and had a constant paranoia that they where going to assassinate him. Yes, many Jews where in government, but there's nothing a Jew hates more than another Jew. And also: Marxism is based upon double-standards. They don't care about consistency. It's similar the how BLM view white people: they hate us unless we entirely submit to their cause.

I have read hundreds of books on Stalin and have not once read that Stalin deported Jews BASED on their ethnicity. Yes, he had paranoia that certain Jews who had different views on the communist order might kill him. I'm sure the Trotskyists were trying to do just that. Many of the Trotskyists were Jews, so if he had deported many of them, it would not have been because he was paranoid of Jews, for he appointed many Jews in his ranks.

Jews where in government, but there's nothing a Jew hates more than another Jew.

That does not mean that Stalin purged Jews because of their ethnicity, in fact, this provides evidence that it was more about ideology. And using the stupid anti-Semitic canard makes little sense. He might have been anti-Chabadism but this also seems to be wrong, for Stalin was on better terms with the Zionistic Chabadnik religious Jews then the old Bolsheviks, of whom many were Jews.

Jew in the party had a certain degree of protection — so long as they aligned with the dictator ideologically.

If you did not align or even opposed Stalin ideologically, you would be deported or executed, whether Jew or not.

Jews where in government, but there's nothing a Jew hates more than another Jew.

Jews hate other Jews because of ideology, not because they're Jews.

It's similar the how BLM view white people: they hate us unless we entirely submit to their cause.

See, I don't think many of the leaders, at least in the past few years thought like this. Something caused a change, I believe this was part of a strategy to discredit and radicalize the movement.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

It has nothing to do with China.

As China has slowly bought our country out from under us, the levels of leftist violence have increased. And now, when TikTok — a Chinese spyware app — is faced with a ban, they riot harder than ever before. They don't know they're fighting for the CCP, they don't even know what they're doing, but the Communist tentacles have infiltrated every aspect of our society.

Jews hate other Jews because of ideology, not because they're Jews.

Well, actually, it's because there are different types of Jews. The Ashkenazi Jews are generally who Zionists see as the master race, while Ethiopian Jews are almost entirely rejected.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The West, that is corporations, has literally used the East for slave labor and the Party lets it happen. China has NOT slowly bought our country out from under us.

People here, in the US sold it out and continue to do so, despite what they may say.

And now, when TikTok — a Chinese spyware app —

PsyOp, and its not a spyware app; they are trying to put blame on China when the real criminals are here, in the US. No need to worry about a country thousands of miles away, when the enemy resides within, and has been destroying the US from the very beginning.

And now, when TikTok — a Chinese spyware app — is faced with a ban, they riot harder than ever before.

This logic makes zero sense and only helps the neocons. You're telling me the ban on an app is causing rioters to riot harder? Who are these rioters?

Well, actually, it's because there are different types of Jews. The Ashkenazi Jews are generally who Zionists see as the master race, while Ethiopian Jews are almost entirely rejected.

Strawman.

You claim that it was because of race or ethnicity or whatever you may have. We were focusing on the Bolshevik Jews, the context was specific to that group! Do not play stupid with me. Of course there are different TYPES OF JEWS. What defines those types? Ethnicity is surely one way to define Jews; that is Sephardi and Ashkenazi and a small minority of Ethiopian Jews. But what is your point? They might fight each other over who are the true Jews, at least that is the case with many Ashkenazi Jews against Ethiopian Jews but it is NOT BECAUSE OF "anti-Semitism," which is the dumbest misnomer I have ever heard of. Anti-Semitism implies that a person is anti-Arabic and anti-Hebrew language, as that is what is its true meaning. I guess if I'm Spanish and do not want Hebrew or Arabic languages to be listed as the two new enforced languages of Mexico, that makes me , what? Anti-Semitic. It will always be because of ideology which was the case of the ethnic atheistical Bolshevik Jews against hasidic Zionist Jews and vice versa.

The Ashkenazi Jews are generally who Zionists see as the master race

What? Certain Jews are Zionists. Revisionist political Zionism supports a Jewish ethnocracy. Not all Ashkenazi Jews are Zionists. Jews have been categorized into a race by a.) National Socialists b.) Political Zionists such as Herzl.

And who are these anonymous Zionists, who according to your post, look up to the Ashkenazi Jews as the "master race?" Do you think rejecting the Ethiopian Jews from this ideology is a good thing or a bad thing?

You seem to be gas-lighting.

Capitalizing China (condensed)

https://earthlinggb.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/capitalizing-china-2.jpg

  1. From 1979 onwards the west gradually had closer and closer talks with China on their integration with the rest of the world from an economy and market perspective.

  2. There was a fundamental problem which existed in China (from a globalist perspective): China did not recognise or use something called “THE LEGAL PERSON”. Such a concept did not exist in China.

  3. The non existence of the legal person concept meant that the west and China could not “speak” to one another and the legal rights (invariably termed “human rights”) which were applied to CORPORATE PERSONS in the west DID NOT exist in China!

  4. There was a need to integrate two very different legal systems which had two very different fundamental jurisprudences. The west using a concept called the LEGAL PERSON and China not. Someone had to “give”. That someone was China.

  5. There are a multitude of what are called “Nominees” Accounts which exist as PRIVATE “subsidiaries” of Public organisations such as the Bank of England and what I have just found in Hong Kong (but US owned): HKSCC which is a PRIVATE subsidiary of the Hong Kong stock exchange.

  6. Remember Hong Kong, although given back to China, is NOT fully integrated with China. It still has its own government.

  7. These “Nominees” accounts DO NOT divulge who the beneficiaries are of the shareholdings which are bought through them. It is acknowledged formally, however, that those who have used BOEN (Bank of England Nominees) have been Heads of state of any and all countries. That is just the Bank of England Nominees however.

  8. The HKSCC is a similar account to the BOEN (as all “Nominees” accounts are). They are entirely private (secret) accounts where the elite heads of state can invest in everything from the world’s banking institutions to the world’s largest energy and resource corporations.

  9. Since the Chinese accepted the “legal person” as a fundamental of their jurisprudence, it has allowed our elite (our Presidents, Prime Ministers, Monarchy etc) to invest in Chinese banks and corporations entirely secretly.

  10. Having achieved this change in the Chinese legal system and now having their money investing and controlling shareholdings in Chinese banks and corporations, they can also offshore the jobs of the west’s multinationals thereby reducing labour costs to a minimum.

  11. Ok this is obvious as we know. BUT our elite have “sold” to us the idea of globalism as being to create ease in doing business and, therefore, creating jobs for us and allowing an easier flow of people between countries (ala the EU). Certainly the ease of flow of people is obvious and documented BUT has it provided more opportunity and wealth FOR any of these people? Yes for those coming into Britain and America – relative to their home state – but it has not had the effect of increasing prosperity on the aggregate, It has had the opposite effect.

  12. The reality is that, yes, the “globalism” has made doing business easier but for whom? The BUSINESS/CORPORATE/MULTINATIONAL OWNERS.

  13. It has reduced their costs by offshoring – made capable by introducing the legal person into chinese law.

  14. It has, therefore, reduced the numbers of employed in the west. This results in people taking jobs which pay peanuts just to live and make ends meet.

  15. Who OWNS the CORPORATIONS? The investors do! Who are the investors in the major chinese banks and corporations? HKSCC – a FOREIGN LEGAL PERSON and, of course, the Chinese government and elite.

  16. The western leaders “cry” about the rise of China BUT it is THEIR personal investments in it which has created that rise. They then turn to us and say we must be more competitive – which means our salaries go DOWN! So they are then the investors in corporations and businesses at home and achieve reduced costs and higher and higher profits therefore. PLUS, they are invested in China in their banks and corporations and make even bigger profits due to the low wages. They work on this over time and the result is this: The world’s labour costs are evened out across the board and they are at the LOWEST common denominator.

It’s like this:

The investor class (elite) take ownership shareholdings in banks worldwide. It is, of course, these banks which provide the liquidity (including interest) to the corporations of the world which these same investors are invested in. They, therefore, own the capital AND the labour. Why do multinational corporations hardly pay an ounce of tax? Because the banks want all the profit. Who do governments borrow from? The Banks!

The Nominees accounts are secret because what is happening is that our elite are absolutely destroying people’s lives for their own profit. YES we know that but what I’m showing you here is HOW they do it. These nominee accounts have VAST sums invested in all banks and all corporations. To ensure that the corporations make the profits they make, the elite destroy the “mom and pop” businesses, the small and medium businesses, by “choking” their liquidity cashflow. That’s why our high streets are dying and it is the large TESCOS and major multinational hypermarkets which are providing everything from clothes to food. furniture (IKEA) etc etc etc. THE NOMINEE ACCOUNT SHAREHOLDERS MUST BE SECRET BECAUSE, IF THEY WERE NOT, PEOPLE – THAT IS THE MAN IN THE STREET WHO HAS LOST EVERYTHING AND ALSO THE SMALL/MEDIUM SIZED BUSINESSMAN (PERHAPS WORTH A MILLION OR TWO) WOULD SEE THAT THE VERY PEOPLE SAYING TO THEM “THE PROBLEM IS CHINA” (OR WHATEVER OTHER COUNTRY) ARE THE VERY PEOPLE INVESTED IN CHINA AND CREATING THE MISERY!

THAT IS WHY IT IS NOT “IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST” FOR THESE NOMINEE ACCOUNTS TO HAVE TO BE TRANSPARENT LIKE EVERY OTHER COMPANY AND WHY YOU HAVE THE OFFICIAL SECRETS ACT COVERING PARAGRAPHS OF THE BANK OF ENGLAND ACT 1946.

AND FOR THE COUNTRIES WHO DO NOT PLAY BALL – I.E. DO NOT ALLOW THEIR ECONOMY AND FINANCIAL/LEGAL STRUCTURE TO BECOME FULLY INTEGRATED WITH GLOBALIST/WESTERN (AND EASTERN) INTERESTS – THEY WILL FIND THEY HAVE A PLANE GO MISSING AND THE REST OF THE WORLD CHASTISE THEM – INCLUDING ONE OF THEIR MAJOR ECONOMIC PARTNERS (CHINA) – OR, THEY WILL FIND THEIR “REGIME” DEMONISED IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER AND THE US AND NATO START DROPPING BOMBS ON THEM!

But the bottom line is this: Our own Heads of state and elite (bankers/politicians) are SCREWING US while they smile in our faces.

https://earthlinggb.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/asia-times-may-2003.jpg

https://earthlinggb.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/asia-times-may-2003-2.jpg

Blaming China simply glosses over the bigger issue that either you are ignorant of or choose to deny.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

People here, in the US sold it out and continue to do so, despite what they may say.

And they sold it to China. You can't sell something without a buyer.

No need to worry about a country thousands of miles away, when the enemy resides within, and has been destroying the US from the very beginning.

We must worry about the enemies within and the enemies outside — for they are one in the same, and if we surrender to one, we inherently surrender to the other.

You're telling me the ban on an app is causing rioters to riot harder?

I'm not saying it's the only reason, but rather noting that the Chinese have more motivation to incite riots through BLM — a Chinese proxy.

Anti-Semitism implies that a person is anti-Arabic and anti-Hebrew language, as that is what is its true meaning.

Now what is the real strawman: denoting why Jews hate each other or attacking the use of a single word?

Not all Ashkenazi Jews are Zionists.

Obviously. And not all Zionists are Ashkenazi.

And who are these anonymous Zionists, who according to your post, look up to the Ashkenazi Jews as the "master race?"

Do I really have to list out every Zionist by name?

Blaming China simply glosses over the bigger issue that either you are ignorant of or choose to deny.

I know you think every problem is somehow caused by the Jews, but I prefer to come to conclusions based-upon evidence. The evidence shows that China is buying America and using their assets to brainwash and manipulate Americans.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

And they sold it to China. You can't sell something without a buyer.

Did you even care to read the capitalizing China piece?

And if you have a buyer you have to have a seller, for the main problem is the SELLER that is here at home!

We must worry about the enemies within and the enemies outside — for they are one in the same, and if we surrender to one, we inherently surrender to the other.

So, China is an enemy? Israel is the enemy and the Zionists who sold our secret military blueprints to China. China is not the enemy. The US empire and the Zionists who gutted and sold it off are. Jefferson was right when he declared that the US should be pro-free-trade, anti-dual citizenship of any kind in US government, and anti-foreign intervention in any sovereign nation.

I'm not saying it's the only reason, but rather noting that the Chinese have more motivation to incite riots through BLM — a Chinese proxy.

You're grasping at straws and using a reductio ad absurdum to try to connect these two things.

The only one that has motivation to incite riots is the US government and the CIA. Have you read anything about what the fascists and P2 lodge in Italy did to merely left leaning persons who disagreed with their views? They conducted bombings, street fighting and strategy of tension operations to instill fear and cause division.

https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=4HRUEqyZ7p8

Now what is the real strawman: dDenoting why Jews hate each other or attacking the use of a single word?

I denoted why Jews sometimes hate other Jews. You used a misnormer. If your house is built on a false premise then it will fall. The term anti-Semitism makes zero sense. The only way someone can be anti-Semitic is if the are OPPOSED to Arabic and Hebrew language.

Do I really have to list out every Zionist by name?

No, but you have to list the people pushing this master race belief for me.

I know you think every problem is somehow caused by the Jews, but I prefer to come to conclusions based-upon evidence. The evidence shows that China is buying America and using their assets to brainwash and manipulate Americans.

Way to use a strawman there buddy.

The evidence shows that China is buying America and using their assets to brainwash and manipulate Americans.

Provide evidence then. Actual evidence. Please. Who owns our media? That would be Zionists and the CIA. Now ask yourself why the CIA would hire Steinmen to push abortion and radical liberal agendas? Reverse psychology?

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

For your reading, the full version: https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2014/03/31/capitalizing-china/

[–]The_Lear_Bluce_Ree 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That R-word is why the other R-words (rich) are dividing us by making everything about the other other R-word (race) because they don't want people to come for THIER heads.

[–]insta 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Insane how mainstream this rhetoric is nowadays.

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

People have always said stupid shit like this, it's just that now we all get to see it.

This guy reminds me of the real "temporary embarrassed millionaires" quote. https://hellyesjohnsteinbeck.tumblr.com/post/23486952183/commonly-misquoted-socialism-never-took-root-in

But anyways no rich guys will be the first to get shot come the revolution because they will just leave the county. It's the people who own property so can't take their wealth with them who get killed. Small business owners, farmers, old people who have saved up for a big house. And the very first people to be killed are always those on the left with a slightly different ideology to the winning group, never the declared, hated enemy.

[–]insta 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I dunno man. This type of rhetoric just seems to be ramping up meanwhile if you don't raise your fist and affirm BLM then you're gonna get assaulted. This stuff just seems to be ramping up at an incredibly pace.

[–]Sw0rdofDam0cles 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The dog whistle heard across the country.

[–]cant_even 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That reptile probably has his own hired posse, and won't go outside without them.

[–]redditbegay 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The political class is laughing all the way to the 2020 elections.

Kicking people out of their homes, as parts of the western coast are burning, we can vote 'Deregulate' the epa Trumpf, or "IM NOT BANNING FRACKING" Joe, who claimed he was banning fracking a month before that.

If none of these feck politicians do ANYTHING for the people soon, that may happen 1-2 years from now.

[–]ANIKAHirsch 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And the left will still say Trump is causing violence.