you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]zyxzevn 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Just to add to it:
In the statistics that I saw on countries, there is no difference in the counts when the masks are introduced. This includes the 2-3 weeks delay. There is no statistical difference.

What I did notice is that the cases increased when tourism started. But just marginally.

There was a direct relationship between tests and the amount of positive cases (some virus may have been detected). Because many of these positive cases had no relationship with the health condition, these tests do not have any correlation with the danger that people are in. Many of the tests are probably false positives. But even if they were working correctly, the tests tell how well most humans can handle the virus. And that the virus is far less dangerous than the media and corrupt scientists are claiming.

Now most of the population has reached herd-immunity, the masks are suddenly introduced as a measure. This is far too late, and just preventing herd-immunity.
It is a political trick that has nothing to do with actual science, but is pushed to keep us scared.

[–]SaidOverRed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But 'muh testing' the sheeple will say without understanding that the testing can literally be attuned too sensitive purposely so that irrelevant fragments are detected instead of actual wuhan flu viruses.