Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted to Kill Babies - More Babies Will Live Without Her

submitted by Trump_WG1WGA from usasupre.me

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]mongre 16 insightful - 7 fun16 insightful - 6 fun17 insightful - 7 fun -  (5 children)

Ask anyone you encounter who is against abortion "How many babies have you adopted?"

99 times out of 100 you hear the sound of crickets.

[–]Earl_Harbinger 12 insightful - 8 fun12 insightful - 7 fun13 insightful - 8 fun -  (1 child)

Ask anyone you encounter who is against rape "How many handies did you give out to incels?"

99 times out of 100 you hear the sound of crickets.

[–]Comatoast 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not normally incels doing the raping, I would say that's extremely rare considering how many have anxiety and problems socializing with women in the first place outside of bitching about or at them online.

[–]KennyLogins 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Adopting a newborn is competitive and expensive, usually costing nearly 50 thousand dollars in the U.S., with the matching process taking years for many who wish to adopt. While many people would be willing to adopt a newborn who would have otherwise been aborted, cost, not morality, is often the issue.

Your premise, like the title of this post, is uniformed and oversimplified. You expect to hurdurdur your way through a complex topic, which is depressingly common.

RBG had no such simplified position. She understood the complexity very well and had this to say

[–]Druullus 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why should they adobt, what makes you think they would be able to take on a child?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

^