you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]meatball4u 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (23 children)

Since when? Since media and academia got taken over by an ethnic minority that thinks they're the Chosen People and have never trusted whites. Popular culture and education is controlled by people operating in bad faith, time to act accordingly

[–]FediNetizen 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

Oh look, another racist Saidit user blaming problems on race.

"When the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail"

[–]meatball4u 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

It might surprise you I never thought I'd ever hold these positions in my lifetime. Funny thing that education and overcoming censorship can change even the most seemingly solid positions. Truth is often bitter, you can recoil at the taste but it's best to consume it as often as possible

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Jews are not a race.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Of course they are.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's a religion with different sects, some radically fundementaliat and supremacist, it's also an ethno-nationalist idenity when need be and a tradition/culture, albeit, anti-Christ.

Judaism is NOT a race period.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No, they're not, though they may claim to be for victimhood and/or privilege - whichever helps them.

[–]just_lesbian_things 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

Since media and academia got taken over by an ethnic minority that thinks they're the Chosen People and have never trusted whites.

And when did that happen? As in, actual years, or at least give me the decade.

Popular culture and education is controlled by people operating in bad faith, time to act accordingly

What's the end game? Burning your country to the ground?

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Hollywood has always been controlled by Jews/Zionists. They've also had a firm grip on academia since The Venitians at least. Check out Webster Tarpley on that history, though you can ignore his modern day analysis.

Ask yourself this: What country that has undergone serious and profound change that was not for the better and had their citizens volunteer for that to happen? Answer: None. From the fall of the Berlin Wall and Russia to any other situation around the world - those citizens did not want collapse - but it was forced upon them by their "leaders".

The current global crisis is completely manufactured and engineered to favour the ruling class only and to grant them more wealth and power in reward for fucking shit up well beyond mere stupidity. They make the chaos and the masses give them more power to fix their chaos and oppress us all more with their "solutions".

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Not always. The Catholics for a time controlled Hollywood and censored all kinds of degeneracy but in the end they lost to the Jews. Hollywood is majority owned by Jews; mostly atheistical but so to religious and Zionist.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

While I'll admit that there were certainly battles for control, I wouldn't say there was ever a switch so much as a compromise for a few decades.

From the beginning Jews ran major studios in Hollywood from Laemmle to Zukor to the Warners in Warner Brothers to the Loew, Goldwyn, and Mayer in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_film_studios#History

Hollywoodism: Jews, Movies and the American Dream (1998) documentary IMDb 7.1/10

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I wouldn't say there was ever a switch so much as a compromise for a few decades.

Yes, better stated.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

From the fall of the Berlin Wall and Russia to any other situation - the citizens did not want collapse - but it was forced upon them by their "leaders".

They collapse it just enough to buy up assets by the pennies and make the lives of the common citizens miserable and then provide them with their pre-planned solution.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. Thanks for the clarification wrapped up with an explanitory bow.

[–]just_lesbian_things 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Hollywood has always been controlled by Jews/Zionists. They've also had a firm grip on academia since The Venitians at least. Check out Webster Tarpley on that history, though you can ignore his modern day analysis

Spare me the conspiracy bullshit. Give me a number. A year or a decade. 1980s? 1930s?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not conspiracy bullshit.

Do your own homework and answer your own questions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_film_studios#History

[–]meatball4u 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

It really started as a result of WWII and trying not to look like anything resembling a Nazi by instituting Jewish quotas in the Ivy league. It increased further as a result of the 1960's cultural upheaval. This article goes into exhaustive detail about Jewish overreach in academia https://www.unz.com/runz/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy/

"The Jewish levels for Yale and Columbia were also around 25 percent, while white Gentiles were 22 percent at the former and just 15 percent at the latter. The remainder of the Ivy League followed this same general pattern.This overrepresentation of Jews is really quite extraordinary, since the group currently constitutes just 2.1 percent of the general population and about 1.8 percent of college-age Americans."

Part of this has to do with Jewish intelligence, which is significantly greater on average than that of Europeans. But Jewish power in both finance and politics dictates what does and doesn't get taught at universities. One of the most obvious effects of this is the wildly disproportionate number of leftist and left leaning professors compared to rightist or right leaning ones 12 to 1 https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/6/liberal-professors-outnumber-conservatives-12-1/

What's the end game? Hopefully free speech serves its purpose in waking people up in the face of the left's racism and egalitarianism. If that doesn't work, then balkanization is probably all that's left

[–]just_lesbian_things 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It really started as a result of WWII and trying not to look like anything resembling a Nazi by instituting Jewish quotas in the Ivy league. It increased further as a result of the 1960's cultural upheaval.

So you're saying that Jewish people did not start taking over media and academia until 1939-1945? Am I getting this right?

Hopefully free speech serves its purpose in waking people up in the face of the left's racism and egalitarianism.

Racism... against non-jewish people? Because Jewish people are overrepresented in academia? Is this correct?

the wildly disproportionate number of leftist and left leaning professors compared to rightist or right leaning ones 12 to 1

Universities are leftist in the US because the American left is more liberal and universities are more liberal. Universities are more liberal because the act of inquiry, research, and learning requires openness to new experiences, which is characterized by liberalism.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

act of inquiry, research, and learning requires openness to new experiences, which is characterized by liberalism.

In theory yes but in practice left leaning "thinkers" are completely dictatorial.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Both of you are correct - it's neither all one nor the other.

There is liberal exploration AND there is communist-totalitarianism WITH much grey between.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There is liberal exploration AND there is communist-totalitarianism WITH much grey between.

Yes in theory. Much like the original meaning of liberal was libertarian but now isn't. Anyone who is a liberal today is not advancing freedom they are advancing tyranny. I'm quite aware that many liberals don't think that but that's a fault of education and learning on their part.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Depends what their precise end game actually is. Sure more power, etc - is general. Cutting up the nation with civil war? Possibly - and it seems like they're aiming for that. However, Balkanization is certainly not all that's left. The totalitarian MIAC-corpra-technocracy will stop at nothing. They have countless ways to dispose of fringe elements - if it comes to that. How much do they want? All of it. How much do they actually need? Enough for complete control for the forseeable future.

[–]meatball4u 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

MIAC?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Eisenhower's "Military Industrial Complex" was originally going to be the "Military Industrial Academic Complex" but they not only thought it was too long a phrase, but they also didn't want to show their entire hand. I forget where I learned that, about half a year ago.