you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]superjesus 26 insightful - 1 fun26 insightful - 0 fun27 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Why are you liberals always leaving out the details?

The officer received a call about an ARMED suicidal man. The officer encountered this black social worker who had been chasing the autistic kid who had run away from home. The officer thought he saw the autistic kid reach for a gun and aim it at the social worker. The officer aimed to shoot the autistic kid, who he believed to be armed (because of the call about an ARMED SUICIDAL man), in order to protect the black man. He shot, but missed and hit the social worker instead. Both men lived. The police department and the social worker settled for an undisclosed amount of money. The police officer was fired from his job and served 6 months probation.

It's a shame that such a terrible mistake was made, but it's also easy to see how it was made. This narrative you liberals keep trying to spin where cops murder unarmed black men for no reason falls apart EVERY TIME. Stop doing it. Stop lying. If you posted something like this with the correct details, maybe you could spawn an intelligent discussion about police training and actions. Instead, you purposefully mislead people by leaving out details to spin your fake narrative EVERY TIME, and it falls apart EVERY TIME, and you end up embarrassing yourselves and getting facts rub in your face and getting called a liar. People are sick of your shit. Stop being dishonest.

[–]happysmash27 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

WOW! I haven't seen such a good debunking in a long time, especially not of something I actually agreed with before seeing the response. Do you have a source I can link about this?

[–]noice 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed. I didn't know much about this case but that's really important info