all 11 comments

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]Firstbrickwall 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    The truth though 👏

    [–]jet199 8 insightful - 7 fun8 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

    Looks like the sickly Victorian child who dies mid way though the novel about someone more interesting.

    [–]magnora7 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

    With a face only a fist would love

    Don't advocate violence, I will ban you

    [–]Chipit[S] 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

    It's not advocating violence! It's just making an observation. The same was done for Nick Sandaman, and the people who called his face punchable were legitimate, credentialed mainstream media!

    [–]bald-janitor 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

    You are innocent, dont let them fool you

    [–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    and the people who called his face punchable were legitimate, credentialed mainstream media!

    You say that like the MSM is magically exempt from advocating violence...

    [–]Chipit[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    If they did anything wrong, they would have been disciplined, or fired. That didn't happen to anyone, ergo it was approved.

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]magnora7 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

      Maybe something like "Avoid editorializing titles of posts unless necessary for clarity."

      I agree, but that's a lot more of a pain in the neck for me to enforce evenly than a "no ad hominems in the title" rule, or even more easily just our existing rule of "don't advocate violence"

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Usually I just tell them and they figure it out. People who editorialize headlines often aren't going to care what a sidebar suggests

        [–]m68k 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

        What a sissy.

        [–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

        Just like u/usehername