all 9 comments

[–]Nemacolin[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Not Alabama, remarkably.

A Massachusetts woman and her adult son are facing serious jail time after the man’s wife caught the two having sex.

Court documents show that Cheryl Lavoie, 64, and her 43-year-old son Tony Lavoie have pleaded not guilty to incest, and last week were ordered by a judge to stay away from each other after they were released on their own recognizance, the Sentinel & Enterprise reported Monday.

Back in May, Tony’s wife caught the two having sex at their home in Fitchburg, about 59 miles northwest of Boston.

The wife then called 911, her cousin told authorities, and police responded to the home for a reported disturbance.

Both Cheryl and Tony separately told the responding officer that this was the first time they’d had sex and it was consensual, according to the officer’s report.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    No. Her sons wife caught them and called the police.

    [–]philosopher 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    Revolting, but the point of incest laws is to stop genetically deformed children being born. Since the woman in this case is well past reproductive age, who gives a shit? Why would you prosecute that?

    [–]Lostcarkeys 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Prosecute it to prevent it ever becoming normalized. You have to stop this degeneracy at every instance and stop it hard or next thing you know you have men in dressed demanding to be called xir while they try to mollest your 9 year old kids and society calls you a bigot for stopping them.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Exactly. Younger me laughed at the slippery slope folks - but they were right, I was wrong.

    [–]jet199 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    It's not just to prevent inbreeding. The vast majority of incest is child abuse. It's another way to get paedos into prison.

    [–]bald-janitor 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Because prosecutors get off on adding another checkmark on their wall of ruined lives. They're despicable scum. If it were a choice between the prosecutor and an adult consenting incest couple that isn't having children, I'd side with the incest couple.

    [–]Squizzel 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    because it offends whatever aesthetic still remains