New Zealand shooter planned to burn down mosques, prosecutor says New Zealand shooter planned to burn down mosques, prosecutor says

submitted by Nemacolin from arabnews.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jacinda 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

A few links:

Some of this is media sensationalism. The Stormer link is embarrassingly hyperbolic but I have included it because it does ask the question; how easy is it for someone from Australia to enter into the upper echelons of a radical jihadist organization (which is presumably concerned about being infiltrated) and how much assistance and verification would be required for them to do so.

[–]Nemacolin[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

So you sort of figure they needed to be killed?

[–]RedditExPat69 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

so you sort of figure that islamic terrorists should be protected and worshiped?

[–]Nemacolin[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

No. Thanks for asking.

[–]RedditExPat69 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

so you sort of figure that people here are thinking the worst 100% of the time but you never are?

[–]Nemacolin[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I am sorry. I have no idea what you are trying to ask.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Don't worry about it. That feeling you got when reading this - that's what happens when somebody who's smarter than you talks to you at his level without expressing himself in "lower IQ parlance". It happens a lot. It's hard for people like that to adapt to the averages. They're usually miles ahead of their conversation partners, and will say things that are obvious to themselves, but not to the other party of the conversation.

[–]Nemacolin[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah. That must be it. Good night.

[–]RedditExPat69 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Apologies. Let me say it slower:

So you're always right in your assumptions of other people & they're always wrong?

I do appreciate your civility.

[–]Nemacolin[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh no! I am old enough to know many, most assumptions are simplifications if not completely wrong. With time you may come to the same point.