you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Anatolia 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (20 children)

black women are only the least attractive in USA because their diet and lifestyle is shit. fast food and lots of meat products. black and asian people aren't build to eat the shitty dairy and meat we have in the USA. thats why you see asians and blacks with cystic acne and fat AF. it's ok to have personal preference, but google image "ethiopian women" and compare to "white women" and tell me what u think. I think there are uggos and pretty ones from both races

[–]Dr_Bukkake 7 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 6 fun -  (2 children)

So white women don’t have access to the same food blacks do? No, black women are unattractive because most of them literally look like the missing link between humans and chimps.

[–]Anatolia 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

what? there are some ugly fatass white women in the same community as blacks.

literally look like the missing link between humans and chimps.

ok

[–]Dr_Bukkake 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are ugly fat ass white women but they can loose the weight and many can become attractive if they do. A skinny gorilla still looks like a gorilla.

[–]Canbot 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You can't trust google search results. Especially when you add White or Black to your search.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    There's more genetic variety in African humans than in all other humans put together. It's no great surprise east Africans are different to people with mostly west African ancestry. East Africans are actually genetically closer to Europeans than they are to west Africans. The anti-black racism stuff doesn't really work in Africa where there's such huge variation.

    [–]72ndGender 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    There's more genetic variety in African humans than in all other humans put together.

    How are you measuring this? As far as phenotypes go, Europeans are the most genetically diverse by far. But I don't doubt there is another standard.

    [–]EuropeanAwakening 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    No, their facial features and evolved behavior are unattractive to most races.

    [–]Anatolia 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    yeah that's why people tan, get brazilian buttlifts, love high cheek bones, get their lips filled, etc.

    [–]72ndGender 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

    You're right. Fit black chicks are still hot af. The best is mixed black chicks since they don't have the dark skin, and have a boost from the white features. Ethiopian women are definitely the best looking African women, but it's worth mentioning that they were mixed in with whites a long time ago. It's why they are Eastern Orthodox Christians.

    [–]EuropeanAwakening 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Yes, fit black women are attractive when they look like white women with brown skin.

    [–]Anatolia 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    The best is mixed black chicks since they don't have the dark skin

    i think that's just media programming. I never watched media as a kid so I never thought of it that way. the darkness didn't matter much to me regardless.

    but it's worth mentioning that they were mixed in with whites a long time ago. It's why they are Eastern Orthodox Christians.

    no they weren't lol. they have some intergenetic mixture with people of ham (blacks) and shem (middle eastern/browns)

    they're eastern orthodox christians because it is one of the birthplaces of abrahamic traditions, and they accepted jesus because they are smart people.

    [–]72ndGender 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Middle Easterners are already mixed with Europeans. That's why so many are almost completely white. That's where the Ethiopians got those European features.

    [–]Anatolia 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    white people descended from black people, all the genes for white people exist in black people. you can get whites out of blacks but not blacks out of whites.

    [–]72ndGender 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Whites didn't descend from blacks, they had a common ancestor. Here's a collection of sources and studies in one book: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BzmzYUZFyTg4SVFWS0lqM2V6Q0E/view

    The "Out of Africa" theory has been thoroughly disproven. But also, what did that have to do with my comment or the conversation we were having?

    [–]Anatolia 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    regardless, that common ancestor was from africa, black or not.

    I've seen that guy's stuff before, I took a brief look, i'll look more into it but he essentially builds up a strawman an outdated "out of africa" hypothesis (this is relating to the recent out of africa theory, not the essentially proven fact that all human dna originates from hominids in africa) and then his argument is that this strawman being inaccurate means black people are inferior.

    he quotes wikipedia as a source, and genuienly believes in the solutrean hypothesis which has no basis in reality

    he makes gross errors like saying "Europe was occupied by Neanderthals, but about 46,000 ya their numbers began to dwindle and Caucasians appeared in their place." when we know that whiteness is a gene developed 6,000-10,000 years ago, and men excavated before this time in europe were literally black.

    regardless, the whole point of this guy's book is "null hypothesis = caucasions are most superior" and he attempts to prove that with any amount of cherry picking and quoting dubious and old sources to make this claim. I think someone's motives are a little fudged if they set out to prove that.

    the writer is obviously an ENTP and they are great at finding random sources to "prove" their point, and thats pretty much all this person has done.

    yeah, some random fringe guy didnt "disprove" or "prove" anything, at best he has an interesting perspective, at worst he has an agenda.

    [–]72ndGender 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    regardless, that common ancestor was from africa, black or not.

    Not necessarily true either. That common ancestor is likely an ape from the middle east.

    not the essentially proven fact that all human dna originates from hominids in africa

    Which proven fact is that? Those same hominids are outside of Africa too. Asia and Europe have several million year old hominids that were discovered.

    when we know that whiteness is a gene developed 6,000-10,000 years ago, and men excavated before this time in europe were literally black

    Do you have a source on that? It sounds a lot like SJW claims.

    Not going to argue your opinion of the guy. If you want to go line by line through his evidence, it would be boring, but feasible. Also, you haven't proven that white people came from Africa. You even said that Europeans were previously black, which means that white people came from black Europeans. Regardless, why are you certain that the first hominids evolved in Africa? What genus/species specifically?

    [–]AndemanMan 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    doesn't matter how fit she is if she smells of cocoa butter and tutti fruity dollar store perfume

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]Anatolia 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      it's never really bothered me, personally. i think it's awesome to the touch, not better nor worse