you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]danuker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

To me it looks like the cop wanted him dead rather than escaped with a taser on foot while drunk.

The cop got tired of the struggle and ended it - though they could have traced him later from documents.

It's a pretty dumb move to tase a cop. But the punishment should fit the crime, and cops should not do the punishing.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The cop got tired of the struggle and ended it - though they could have traced him later from documents.

My personal view: What if runs again? They can just catch him later? Will he keep drinking and driving until he kills himself and someone else?

I'm really not a let them run kinda guy. Just letting them run means the law is meaningless.

[–]danuker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

He can't run forever. The police outnumbers and outspends him, and documents are shared across the police force. Also, he'd be missing a car now.

DUI has lawful punishments, and being shot dead is not one of them.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

He can't run forever.

He just needs to run whenever the police try to apprehend him, or until he has a fatal accident in a DUI.

[–]danuker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The police, now knowing that the guy can evade 2 cops, could organize a stakeout at, say, his home, with more than 2 cops.

Also, perhaps the guy would not be so eager to drink and drive again, having had an encounter with the police.