Why does the Wuhan coronavirus genome end in aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa (33 a's)? And does this indicate that it is man made?

submitted by magnora7 from bioinformatics.stackexchange.com

all 33 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]magnora7[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

And then there's this too, the paper that found the HIV genome sequences embedded within the coronavirus, but then was forced to withdraw their paper: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v1.full.pdf

And now the discoverer of HIV himself, a nobel prize winner, is saying that he thinks it's man-made due to the HIV genome insertions: https://www.zerohedge.com/health/covid-19-man-made-virus-hiv-discoverer-says-could-only-have-been-created-lab

[–]g_dark 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Unfortunately, after the Nobel prize M. has been drifting to crank territory: self-publishing (no peer-review), homeopathy... This contrarian view re the coronavirus, against the vast majority of scientists, is not in the least believable.

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do you have a link that's an example of him supporting homeopathy?

[–]magnora7[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

The large number of the same gene repeating is very statistically unlikely, so this is another point of evidence that the virus was man-made.

Here's more information about the process of adding the "A"s (called the poly(A) tail) : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyadenylation

[–]magnora7[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Actually that wiki article says the following:

These bacterial poly(A) tails are about 30 nucleotides long. In as different groups as animals and trypanosomes, the mitochondria contain both stabilising and destabilising poly(A) tails. Destabilising polyadenylation targets both mRNA and noncoding RNAs. The poly(A) tails are 43 nucleotides long on average.

So I guess the 33 nucleotide tail isn't too irregular compared to other RNA sequences.

I think the HIV spliced genes are more of the indicator it was man-made.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Have you seen the "HIV is a deadly virus" evidence?

It's dubious, at best. :-/

[–]zyxzevn 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In the roundtable discussion with Dr Judy Mikovitz,
she explains that it was normal for scientists to try to add functions to viruses. She even worked on that herself in the military labs.
See:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RO2Fh3ThKoE/
(Long video - just take the Judy parts.)

She also did research on HIV. But related to the virus, it shows that such labs create bioweapons.

Similar research was done in Wuhan (also with US scientists), and any of those labs (in US or China) could have been leaking by accident or on purpose.

This is clearly in line with the totalitarian agenda, as proposed by New-World-Order people, so it seems no accident to me at all.
Also the way major nations just lead the virus spread to almost every country before taking any measures.

[–]Robin 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I disagree with the phrase "statistically unlikely" -- it depends on the statistical model. There's more "e"s than "x"s in this sentence. My body has more skin on the edge than in the middle. Not everything in life is uniform and random. In fact, nothing is if you look closely enough... :-)

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes it turns out 30-40 is normal, so it's really nothing special apparently. The HIV insertion seems to be better evidence of it being man made, if that's indeed the case

[–]Nemacolin 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

"To get to the other side?"

[–]Extract 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

..of the lung.

[–]daikuji 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Good observation! The 3' poly(A) tail is actually a very common feature of positive-strand RNA viruses, including coronaviruses and picornaviruses.

For coronaviruses in particular, we know that the poly(A) tail is required for replication, functioning in conjunction with the 3' untranslated region (UTR) as a cis-acting signal for negative strand synthesis and attachment to the ribosome during translation. Mutants lacking the poly(A) tail are severely compromised in replication

[–]AntiLowEffortHuman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Sorry for asking (i never really understood biology that much!) but does this mean your knowledge aligns with the headline, or do you think it's likely natural and not man made? Thank you!

[–]daikuji 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

idk i just copy and pasted it from a science site, and from what ive seen nearly all virus' have poly a tail for replication, and i dont think its man made, it would much worse id it were man made

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I don't think any intelligent person doubts that this came from a lab. The question is weather it was engineered simply for testing or for use as a weapon. Given how poorly it kills it is almost certainly not in a weapons form now. At best it is a delivery system and either doesn't have a warhead, or it is doing some kind of damage we don't yet know about.

[–]magnora7[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

I don't think any intelligent person doubts that this came from a lab.

Lol you would be surprised.

Given how poorly it kills it is almost certainly not in a weapons form

Weapons can also be used to degrade and exhaust people, weapons aren't just about killing, they're about projected power.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

yeah this wlll be like lyme, herpes, HIV etc. Maybe not kill right away but causes fatigue, is with you for life, dulls senses, makes people easier to control.

[–]The_Lear_Bluce_Ree 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yup exactly. That's why they changed the way landmines work because killing people outright wasn't as effective as wounding them, slowing down the unit that has to care for him now, filling hospital beds, and exhausting medical staff.

Why wouldn't a weaponized virus attempt to accomplish the same thing?

[–]Robin 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think any intelligent person doubts... "A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest..."

[–]blacksabbath 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But isn't it normal for virusses to have a 5cap and poly a tail? It is strange if they don't have a 5cap and poly a tail.

[–]RickC-137 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This example could be misinformation. Sorta like how Comet Pizza was inserted to completely quash the whole Pizzagate story when it had nothing to do with it other than to create a smear campaign against everything Pizza related.

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly. The take the core of the story and pair it repeatedly with some ridiculous detail that makes no sense, thus leading everyone to the conclusion the story itself is ridiculous and nonsensical.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe it's like a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telomere ?

Over time we lose telomeres in cell reproduction. Part of staying young involves retaining telomeres. Once the telomeres run out, then you're days are numbered.

[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Corona viruses are common and exist in nearly all of us. Criticism of the tests now available for SARS-CoV-2 (usually called COVID-19 that has never been isolated) are extremely inaccurate since they will indicate positive for any patient who has previously had any Corona virus, that is, most of us. Slso, ask yourself, where were the tests made?

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

There are like 4 types of test though, only one type does that.

[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I see. Is that the PMR or something similar? Scientists say it is useless. I will try to get my facts straight from now on. Thanks.

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I'm not super educated about it myself, but I know there is the gene-matching test (which checks for a portion of the DNA to match) which is called the RT-PCR test. Then there is an antibody test called the COVID-19 IgG/IgM test, which I think will do as you said and detect antibodies not only from covid19, but from all coronaviruses. But I am not 100% sure that's how it works. I do know those are the two main types of tests, and I think almost all tests conducted worldwide so far have been the RT-PCR RNA-matching tests, as that was developed first. I think the antibody tests are just now becoming available

But as of now, I think 95% of diagnoses are being made by x-ray, without running either of those tests. The x-rays show a characteristic "broken glass" look in the lungs, apparently

[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Where I live they are reclassifying the cause of death to "COVID-19" retroactively. In one case an older man collapsed on the sidewalk complaining of chest pains but without any other symptoms. Yes, it was not a heart attack but COVID. :) Just my opinion but this is all a royal scam.

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes that is happening too, for sure. I was reading in the US each hospital is guaranteed $12,000 in insurance money for every covid19 death they experience. So the hospitals are financially incentivized to report every death as covid. Especially while the hospitals are half empty which is hurting their revenue significantly, so they are scrambling for money.

[–]Robin 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

$12,000 in insurance money for every covid19

A school teacher friend of mine told about money earmarked for "special needs kids"...

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

33 is such a masonic/satanist number.. too obvious

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I guess upon further research the number varies as the virus does different things. During infection, the number increases. During transmission the number decreases. So even the number itself I have there isn't that meaningful, apparently. I learned all that after posting it

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

at first i thought the crispr editor guy fell asleep on his keyboard