you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I do not believe you. The anthrax guy killed himself. The case against him is quite strong.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you think Bruce Ivins did the Anthrax attacks, you're ignorant. Who benefited from the attacks, it sure wasn't the lone nut that conveniently killed himself before he could testify, or the two other individuals who sued for libel after being falsely blamed for the attacks by a bunch of neoconservative Jewish Zionists, who likely were complicit in the attacks. Donald Kagen minutes after the attacks and all of his machivellian friends pushed the theory that an Anthrax attack would happen on US soil by state actor: Iraq. Interestingly, the goal was to firstly send anthrax to two congressmen, democrats, who refused to sign the Patriot Act into law. Who would benefit from that? Then, conveniently, two Zionists wrote a timely book and published it during the Anthrax attacks concerning Iraq and anthrax. The anthrax letters were laughably obvious to anyone that they looked to be made by someone wishing to pin the blame on Iraq and the hijackers, as referenced by the 9-11-01 date and 'Death to Israel' reference.

When the real perpetrators nearly outed themselves by blaming Iraq and making the 9/11 connections, they had to change to the domestic blame game. Initially it was neo-nazis, then it was a Egyptian man, who sued for libel, then Hatfill, who was falsely blamed and finally Ivins, who allegedly committed suicide. Case closed? No, not really because in a lawsuit against the FBI, and US government for gross negligence, they proved in a court of law that Ivins did not have the capability nor the equipment to create this sophisticated anthrax spore wrapped in tin. The case was closed and the family who got a large payout process that it wasn't Ivins but because it was simply a compensation for a family member that died from the Anthrax, Ivins continues to be the falsely accused perp.

Furthermore, we have Zionist owned media pundits and TIMES columnists, all of them Zionists, shilling the lie that the anthrax spores were not wrapped in Tin but by a different material which was closely linked to Iraq. Where dod they get this info, nobody knows but they shilled it for months.

Likewise, these same Zionists in the media, one of which just so happened to play a role in 'Operation Dark Winter', which includes the dispersal of Anthrax spores in the mail (Woolsey: also a Zionist had a role in this drill) was sent fake anthrax in the mail, possibly to con people that they too were attacked, even though they were fake spores whilst those who opposed the Patriot Act or one in particular close to a News anchors wife who, being a real estate agent, happened to find an apartment in Hollywood Florida for the Patsy hijackers close to Mossad, died from anthrax spores. Coincidence? Most definitely not.

The goal was to link the anthrax with the false 9/11 perps. It was planned before 9/11 but it backfired, and the media was involved in pushing this myth and creating fictional stories.

Read Graeme MacQueen's book!

This case for Ivins is not strong at all.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Don't believe me, read the damn article and Graeme's book.