New Jersey cops told to halt all use of controversial facial-recognition technology
submitted 4 years ago by Nemacolin from (nj.com)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Zahn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 4 years ago (3 children)
Seems like left leaning states hate the bill of rights for some reason....
[–]Nemacolin[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 4 years ago (2 children)
What would this possibly have to do with the Bill of Rights?
[–]Zahn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 4 years ago (1 child)
Fourth Amendment: Protects privacy against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.
[–]Nemacolin[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)
The police did not search or seize anything. They identified the face of a person suspected of a crime. It is nothing a trained policeman would not have done.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~1 user here now
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Zahn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (3 children)
[–]Nemacolin[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (2 children)
[–]Zahn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–]Nemacolin[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)