Abby Martin Banned From Speaking at US University For Refusing to Sign Pro-Israel Pledge

submitted by REDISCOM from albiontimes.co.uk

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

How is making it happen vs letting it happen any less guilty? Both equally evil, IMO.

Luke Rudkowski or Jason Bermas denounced Loose Change? Links? Why indeed?

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Because making it happen, means that they planned it and ordered it to happen. Let it happen, means the offical story is the truth, such as the hijacking charade and that ONLY THE US government let it happen for war's sake.

Luke Rudkowski or Jason Bermas denounced Loose Change? Links? Why indeed?

I don't knwo about that, but Luke is controlled in my opinion, and the creator of Loose Change, which I have to find the BBC doc, denounced his former documentaries falling back on the LIHOP theory. That theory gives everyone a pass, and puts the blames on Islam and muslims.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Interesting. I thought the official story was they didn't see it coming. Is that what you mean by letting it happen?

To me there are 3 levels.

1) Standing on the sidewalk you hear the brakes and turn around to see the baby carriage get hit. It suddenly happened.

2) On the sidewalk you see the baby carriage and the car coming and do nothing despite ample time. Let it happen.

3) You push the carriage into the street, leave it there, and return to the sidewalk. Make it happen.

Sorry to hear that about Luke. He has a few other controversies too, but I figure we all do.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That they might have knew it was going to happen, but poor intelligence and knowing that such an event somewhere would cater to their geopolitical interests would in the long run benefit the US government. SO, LIHOP, melds the poor intelligence excuse with the possibility that they let the HIJACKERS complete their plan which destroyed 3.5 buildings. So, the hijacker narrative is still the true narrative in this story. The REAL narrative is that they planned and conducted it and covered it up. the LIHOP is part of that cover up; it is a limited hangout.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, and the hijacker story is full of holes from all directions too.

Thanks for the talk. I had never really thought of conflating 1) and 2) into a single LIHOP. They are clever.