you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Wouldn't this be against the US 1st amendment?

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

The constitution doesn't mean what used to, if it ever did. Power does what it wants, regardless of era, and will twist the rules as it sees fit - or make new ones.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, it doesn't mean shit anymore because, we are under COG and the people could care less about their rights whic hhave been thrown down the drain. THE US GOVERNMENT and CONGRESS are Incorporated. We are a CORPORATION NOT a country, and thusly, we, as citizens incorporated do not abide under common law or the constitution. SInce, Lincoln, the US has become a corporation and our social security numbers prove this as well as legal documents and congress straight up saying they are a STAR CHAMBER and that the US government and congress is a corporation.

You are simpl a product of that corporation and if you have a SS# and vote to charter a president as a contract between you and the corporation, you WAIVE YOUR RIGHTS, Unfortunately, 98% of the people here on saidit and in the US don't understand this.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed.

If the constitution ever did mean anything, besides selective privileges (rich, poor, men, women, white, black).

After the Civil War the Black community was well on the rise. After the World Wars it got worse again in the 50s and 60s. Almost as if engineered. And again now, after the Clinton's 90s policies were introduced with a predicted fall out.

It makes one wonder what all this anti-White Male Privilege fall out will be over the next 20-30 years.