Abby Martin Banned From Speaking at US University For Refusing to Sign Pro-Israel Pledge

submitted by REDISCOM from albiontimes.co.uk

all 68 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]bablarb 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Good thing these rules weren't around in the 80s, or the boycott of South-Africa would have failed.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is exactly was Isreal is trying to avoid.

They saw the writing on the wall.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Wouldn't this be against the US 1st amendment?

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

The constitution doesn't mean what used to, if it ever did. Power does what it wants, regardless of era, and will twist the rules as it sees fit - or make new ones.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, it doesn't mean shit anymore because, we are under COG and the people could care less about their rights whic hhave been thrown down the drain. THE US GOVERNMENT and CONGRESS are Incorporated. We are a CORPORATION NOT a country, and thusly, we, as citizens incorporated do not abide under common law or the constitution. SInce, Lincoln, the US has become a corporation and our social security numbers prove this as well as legal documents and congress straight up saying they are a STAR CHAMBER and that the US government and congress is a corporation.

You are simpl a product of that corporation and if you have a SS# and vote to charter a president as a contract between you and the corporation, you WAIVE YOUR RIGHTS, Unfortunately, 98% of the people here on saidit and in the US don't understand this.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed.

If the constitution ever did mean anything, besides selective privileges (rich, poor, men, women, white, black).

After the Civil War the Black community was well on the rise. After the World Wars it got worse again in the 50s and 60s. Almost as if engineered. And again now, after the Clinton's 90s policies were introduced with a predicted fall out.

It makes one wonder what all this anti-White Male Privilege fall out will be over the next 20-30 years.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You think they care about the constitution, give up your social security number and then maybe they'll think twice about spitting on that piece of paper. Until then, you are a product of the corporation of the UNTIED STATES &c., and you have ZERO rights only privilages that the state can take away at whim. As long as you play their little game.

[–]sproketboy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

Aww. It's so sad when it happens to the left. You created this leftist scums. You made your bed - lie in it.

[–]h5erahber5a 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

RTFA. The university, Georgia Southern University, has this clause in the contract because it is state law, Georgia SB 327, passed in 2016 by a majority Republican state legislature.

http://www.legis.ga.gov/legislation/en-US/Display/20152016/SB/327

https://palestinelegal.org/georgia

I wouldn't call this a "right-wing" thing either, it's low-budget corruption, anyone with a million dollars can get the same access.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 9 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 5 fun -  (10 children)

I wouldn't call this a "right-wing" thing either

Exactly. It's Isreali manipulation capture of the US government.

Imagine if China or Russia did something like this.

Every politician who voted for this type of legislation should be locked up for treason. This is a betrayal of the Constitution and their fellow American's 1st amendment rights.

They were elected to represent their constituents.

They are traitors.

[–]kokolokoNightcrawler 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

And how do you take it to Supreme court when one third of its members are the small hats tribe. America is lost I'm afraid. Lucifer has a firm grip on it

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

America is lost I'm afraid.

America is a sleeping giant.

It can wake up.

9/11 Truth is the answer.

If you are a patriot, then get informed of the facts.

Spread the truth.

[–]kokolokoNightcrawler 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I've pretty much figured out the facts already. I've known about Bollyn for years now. The question is how do I forget all this shit cos it's only depressing me

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Make anti-establishment fan fiction/counter-propaganda that exposes the lies!

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So you already knew that Israel and the American Zionists did 9/11?

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Also, the UK, Canada, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, etc are complicit.

Plus most of the world's leaders got on board, by either accepting (not questioning) the events, and even starting their own wars on terror, generally domestically.

[–]kokolokoNightcrawler 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

If you say so, Jason. I trust you've done your homework on the subject. It's just so f'd up to realize we are all ruled by a bunch of psychopaths

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Trust but verify.

Humanity has always been under a kakistocracy of one sort or another.

Only a very few nations and/or leaders bothered to question the "official" narrative.

[–]kokolokoNightcrawler 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Silverstein, Cheney and Israel, yes

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

A+++

[–]sproketboy 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

It doesn't matter. You started it and clowns pass clown laws - like you want so you can destroy civilization to make your magic Marxist utopia. Go ask an Eastern European, a North Korean, or a Venezuelan about how that worked out for them.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Haha! You all act like time doesn't make the death of all things.

But please, by all means; hasten your demise. Marxism is the real issue!

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Why don't you pick all the successes? Cuba has survived against the US despite crushing sanctions for decades and countless assassination attempts. Venezuela is doing just fine, except the UK stole their gold and won't let them buy the supplies the US claims their gov is denying them while trying to deny them more via sanctions. Why did you omit the entire hugely successful European North?

Like Capitalism, Socialism is a just tool, used for both good and evil, sometimes both. That's all. Like science, like religion, like justice systems, technology, economics, etc etc etc. All tools to play with.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (36 children)

she denied 9/11 was false flag, she's coopted

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (35 children)

Did she? She used to be a 9/11 truther.

When did she deny it?

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (27 children)

she got paid off and quit RT, then denied it as part of what she was paid for

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (25 children)

Do you have a source?

Her brother is/was a truther, as well. He also made an American Antrhrax documentary, so they're both well informed about the 9/11 facts.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

RObbie Martin is good, but he also is a LIHOP gatekeeper. I emailed him and he will ONLY go so far, never getting into the basics of demolition etc. I can never make out what he believes, maybe he is tryign to stay professional, although I don't knwo considering he is always smoking on his podcasts, but he'll only say so much about Mossad and the Likudniks, etc., but seems to never want to talk about the obvious 9/11 drone theory and WTC demolition.

I reccomend Graeme MacQueen's book on teh 2001 Anthrax Deception,

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

LIHOP

Letting It Happen On Purpose

http://www.halexandria.org/dward255.htm

Interesting indeed. You won't get assassinated (as much) for spitting their own new sources and propaganda back at them (ie. A Very Heavy Agenda, from what I've heard as I haven't seen it yet).

Thanks for the book recommendation.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

He's weird though. He questions WTC7, but as time goes on he starts shying away from the demolition theory and says, "well, even if it WAS NOT a demolition, the offical narrative isn't the truth." And it seems like he's tryign to push his leaders to the LIHOP theory which so many shills were tasked with doing. Think about Loose Change. It is quite odd that the creator denounced his past films and was featured on teh BBC doc on 9/11 pushing the LIHOP narrative. Why would he do that. Is he afriad people know to much about who might have done it?

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

How is making it happen vs letting it happen any less guilty? Both equally evil, IMO.

Luke Rudkowski or Jason Bermas denounced Loose Change? Links? Why indeed?

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Because making it happen, means that they planned it and ordered it to happen. Let it happen, means the offical story is the truth, such as the hijacking charade and that ONLY THE US government let it happen for war's sake.

Luke Rudkowski or Jason Bermas denounced Loose Change? Links? Why indeed?

I don't knwo about that, but Luke is controlled in my opinion, and the creator of Loose Change, which I have to find the BBC doc, denounced his former documentaries falling back on the LIHOP theory. That theory gives everyone a pass, and puts the blames on Islam and muslims.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Interesting. I thought the official story was they didn't see it coming. Is that what you mean by letting it happen?

To me there are 3 levels.

1) Standing on the sidewalk you hear the brakes and turn around to see the baby carriage get hit. It suddenly happened.

2) On the sidewalk you see the baby carriage and the car coming and do nothing despite ample time. Let it happen.

3) You push the carriage into the street, leave it there, and return to the sidewalk. Make it happen.

Sorry to hear that about Luke. He has a few other controversies too, but I figure we all do.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

new thing called google. not sure about robbie, he seems good.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

I'm pretty sure she's still adamant that 9/11 was fishy as fuck.

I know that she's chosen to distance herself from the "Truther Movement" because of all the nut jobs in it.

I know she's gone very quiet on it, sadly. I suspect, like Naomi Klein, she is only reporting on that which she can verifiably prove.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Name the nut jobs?

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Are you serious?

There are a lot of crazy theories out there. Some even have a foot in reality.

For example, as a professional animator in NYC 1996-2001 + 2004 all mostly at NTSC 720x486(510) @ 30fps interlaced, I can guarantee you that with a small talented team with the proper connections, the live 9-11 footage of planes hitting the towers, plus following up with all the other collected footage COULD have been faked if no planes were actually there. Knowing all of this, I still find it utterly absurd that the deep state actors involved would have bothered with this route, especially with all the other evidence.

In short, I believe real planes (or drones) hit the towers. (The Pentagon is another question, and Barbara Honegger has the best take on that, IMO.)

Another popular person who seems to be intentionally obtuse or an infiltrator is Dr. Judy Wood.

Even Richard Gage's Architects & Engineers seems infiltrated, raising lots of money to be mismanaged and delayed by some lady exec (I forget her name) that really shouldn't have been allowed power on the board. (All this is second hand via David Slesinger, legit and active and of the few fighting the good fight (if he's still there) on Quora, another extreeeeeemely rigged site.)

If I'm not mistaken you have a grudge on Ryan Dawson who has either gotten soft or confused on some things or as you suggest intentionally muddies the water on them. I had a long one I meant to finish and share about that but to be honest I don't give much of a fuck about the minutia of Dawson's casual inaccuracies as they come up then are put down so often it's annoying. He's also over-confident in a lot of areas - like Epstein is dead. Most likely but far from proven.

Then there are the tribalists who say it's this group or that group - or it's not them. Meanwhile it's obvious it's an international cooperative effort among leaders and their trusted conspirators.

Beyond that I can't go into more detail as I don't waste time on remembering the nonsense. And to be quite frank, I don't know who she considers to be nut jobs enough to denounce the whole movement, or the so-called wide-spread fracturing of it, who as a whole seem worthy of denouncing and distancing from. I've seen many different areas of 9-11 to focus on, but I have yet to see distinctly different communities arise from it. But maybe that's just me.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Thanks, I just wanted to know if you knew, who they were. I would NOT call them nutjobs though, but cognitive infiltraters. They know that they are putting out nonsense and half-truths because that are hired to do just that. Like Alex Jones and Stratfor.

The hollow towers, and dummies is a weird theory.

What is true is that the towers were low in capacity and some researchers might be right on the large number killed, which might be faked. Simon Shack had discovered that nearly ALL the peopel who were on the four planes were mock vicsims. And there is much evidence to this. Many of the people who died in the towers were also mock vicsims. I do not believe that nobody died, that woudl be the greatest magic trick and fake terror attrocity in history but there was a PSYOP being conducted on 9/11 that day, and I believe it was the planes. I do NOT think anyone was on them and the planes that hit the towers and Pentagon and the one that supposedly dissapeared into a hole in PA, were drones made to look like passenger Jets as per Operation Northwoods.

I don't trust Barbara Honegger and her past history.

Wood is an obvious controlled opposition.

Even Richard Gage's Architects & Engineers seems infiltrated, raising lots of money to be mismanaged and delayed by some lady exec (I forget her name) that really shouldn't have been allowed on the board. (All this is second hand via David Slesinger, legit and active and of the few fighting the good fight (if he's still there) on Quora another extreeeeeemely rigged site.)

He's a freemason and the logo looks liek a freemasonic compass, but Gage seems to be in the right place but it is true, many people in that movement are shills trying to subvert it.

Yes, Dawson bans anyone who questions the plane psyop. That is: if one believes in the Operation Northwoods, drone theory.

Meanwhile it's obvious it's an international cooperative effort among leaders and their trusted conspirators.

I agree, it served the purposes of the anglo-American establishment acutely for arms dealers, defense contractors, etc and oil companies and possibly LNG companies but it also hurt many large oil companies doing bussiness with Iraq. I think the IRAQ war was pushed largely by Mossad, and the neocons, Afghanistan by the anglo-American establishment and UNOCAL. To say it was Israel only, is to deny that the anglo-American establishment benefited from it. It is clear Israel did benefit from 9/11 and the global war on terror. Who carried out the attack, it seems to me Zionsit interests did 9/11. From teh cover-up, managerial, and planning and security all under Zionist control, it is clear the Likudniks and ZIonists within the US government and executive branch had a hand. As for the demolition, someone was contracted.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Right. I used the "nut jobs" pejorative because she used it or something akin to it, without explaining why. Of course, I forgot Alex Jones too.

Never heard of hollow towers, though I heard they were largely empty too.

Dummies is new to me too. The photos of the jumpers are real, even if there's not much blood. Almost half of the number don't have DNA verification and I suspect many of them may be fiction to inflate the number.

With each impact debris flew out the other side, and one would presume some bodies and parts too. This directional velocity might have even gone further than the ejected debris in the collapse.

I'm with you on the drones thing. To what end, and what happened to the others, I don't know, other than removing potential variables that could complicate matters. I do know that it would be VERY easy to dispose of a lot of people quietly - more so than the MSM would have you believe. (ie. Holocaust : If they're already in a train car, leave them there for a week or few, then park the train on a river bridge with a large grinder under the train car's drop-away floor. So much simpler.)

Why don't you trust Honegger? Her history? And do you like any of her theories?

Great clear summary on the Zionists and Likudniks - yet no one in the MSM is even willing to question the origins of the Global War Of Terror.

Indeed, someone was contracted to take down the >3.5 towers.

The military also has professional demolition teams, but they aren't concerned about falling into footprints, etc. with other war-focused priorities. Hard to say who it could have been as this falls into the footprint of neither, typical military nor typical demolition.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I suspect that everything changed for her after JRE 1111.

Just like it did for Joe Rogan.

Too much truth about Isreal was exposed to too many people.

The episode is well worth watching.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I know I saw it, but don't recall much more about it. I don't even remember the last JRE I saw. He slid terribly.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I'm afraid of new things... Please help...

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

the real tom bombadil would throw google up into the air and catch it and make it disappear

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 5 fun1 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

That keeps happening.

That's why i need your help...

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

More than just American Anthrax, he made A Very Heavy Agenda (which I can't afford to buy and has yet to be pirated).

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I watched it, it's good, but the music sort of gets annoying. I think everyone should watch it, but it never really gets into the connection between 9/11 and the NEOCONS, and he mentions the so-called fascist mercenary fighters in the Ukraine who are fighting the seperatists ie. Russians in eastern Ukraine. They are neo-nazis, allegedly, but he forgets to mention that their biggest donor is a Zionist, Israeli Jew. And the more I looked into them they more I realized they were not really neo-nazis but just used their symbology. It would have been good to talk about the funding involved. As for Trump, Martin said there is a part 6, but he never published it.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

LOL, Robbie Martin is also known as the ambient music artist Florescent Grey.

I was lead to believe AVHA was all about the NeoCons and their Project For A New American Century, especially the Kagan clan.

Interesting stuff!

From 2015-2017 I really wanted what is now the /s/Trutherism101 project to include a lot of irrefutable soundbites of villains in their own words in order to be "legit" with citations, etc. Eventually I dropped the sample-fest concept for a bigger picture without the distractions of celebrity and their words, and finally grew the confidence to be my own legitimate source with my own views.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is about the Neocons but a documentary that focuses on their movements after 9/11. It isn't as potent as linking them to 9/11 as other films.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anyone who is on RT is co-opted.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

When she maried her Jewish boyfriend who was friends with 9/11 disinfo gatekeeper Mr. Roth, who then went onto deny that Israel or Zionsits had anything to do with 9/11. She is teh pupil of the gatekeeper and leftist Blumenthal (look up his father). Basically she sold out like Democracy Now and Jeremy Scahill and Amy Goodmen and Chomsky. She says a lot of good things but to keep her pay and to get funding she must never mention 9/11. But then again almsot everything in the 9/11 fake truth movement is co-opted.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

oh.

fuck.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

News to me.

Max Blumenthal has his limits, biases, and blind spots but I like his work. Sometimes I wonder if he's part of the theater too. Yes, Scahill, Goodman, and Chomsky are now limited hangouts, afraid to push further. I don't know what the fake movement is.

Mike Prysner, her fiance, made the news way back when with his return from serving in Iraq and calling out the powers that be. Good stuff, worth looking up.

Neat bio: https://marriedwiki.com/wiki/abby-martin

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

His father is a government shill. SO I'd say Blumenthal has an agenda, and he is a leftist Zionist. Just look up Blumenthal Leftist Zionist. ALSO, he attacks anyone who questions the 9/11 official story. He attacked Alison weir too, and I found her small little book quite interesting.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Didn't know about most of that. It's so disappointing finding out about how limited the limited hangouts are.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

PART 1

Max Blumenthal for one. The son of longtime Clinton ally and key figure in the destruction of Libya, Sidney Blumenthal, Max has a dubious at best record when it comes to issues related to war and government accountability. For example, while Sidney Blumenthal was busy relaying some of the worst lies about Libya and Gaddafi to Hillary Clinton in an effort to profit from regime change, Max was attacking people who questioned the western media/government consensus that Gaddafi as an evil monster. He referred to former Congresswoman and outspoken opponent of Libyan regime change Cynthia McKinney as the "face of lunacy" for "surrounding herself with 9/11 truthers." Shortly after the September 2012 Benghazi attack, Max wrote an op-ed for The Guardian where he claimed that the attacks were caused by a right wing anti Islam propaganda film, which became the official story from the Obama Administration for why the attack took place. Sidney emailed the article to Hillary Clinton, to which Hillary responded by saying "Your Max is a Mitzvah!" In addition to serving the establishment agenda on the destruction of Libya, Max for years and up until recently promoted similar lies about Syria. For example, Max applauded Jeremy Scahill for refusing to participate in an anti war conference with Syrian nun Mother Agnes Mariam, outspoken in her questioning of the blaming of Assad for the August 2013 chemical weapons attack, labeling her an Assad shill. Max also in 2012 resigned from the Syrian media outlet Al Akhbar, claiming that it is headed by Assad apologists. I detailed in a previous article Max's outspoken hostility towards the 9/11 Truth Movement. Max has recently done a 180 on Syria and now presents himself as being opposed to the policies he once supported. However, he refuses to apologize for or to even acknowledge his previous actions, and apparently he continues to support his father's unapologetic pro Clinton ideology, as he was a featured guest at Sidney Blumenthal's book release party last Summer. Until he publicly addresses all of this and expresses genuine regret for his propagating of lies which have created untold amounts of damage, my belief is that he is not to be trusted. Despite all of this, Max Blumenthal has endorsed both Robbie and Abby Martin, and Abby in particular appears to enjoy publicly associating with Blumenthal.

Joining Max Blumenthal in the esteemed ranks of reliable and credible journalists are Ben Norton and Rania Khalek. Ben and Rania are both very close to Max, and like Max, they both for years promoted the establishment narrative about Assad and Syria before changing their stances just within the past couple of years. Ben Norton has deleted dozens of tweets and other social media posts condemning the Assad government while promoting western propaganda as fact. Norton wrote one of the most vile anti Assad pieces I have encountered, claiming that Assad is supported primarily by anti Semites and Nazi apologists. Norton has also criticized Abby Martin, labeling her a conspiracy theorist. Isn't it funny how Abby and Robbie Martin gaining more acceptance within the progressive (foundation and Soros funded) anti war community which opposes 9/11 truth directly coincides with their watering down of long held views regarding what happened on 9/11? Despite all of this, Norton currently helps out with Abby's current program, The Empire Files, and Norton has written articles for Foundation funded AlterNet in support of the show. Khalek, like Norton also has a history of promoting western propaganda which aids Syrian regime change efforts, and has also deleted tweets in which she expressed her support for Western propaganda efforts against the Assad government. Khalek has also tweeted criticism of people who attempt to expose the truth about 9/11. Khalek to her credit, unlike Blumenthal and Norton, has at least tried to explain her past stance and her evolving view, during an interview with Mint Press News. While I do respect Khalek's willingness to acknowledge and express regret for her prior stance, her continued closeness to the likes of Norton and the unapologetic Blumenthal cause me to continue viewing her with skepticism. And even if their change of heart is 100 percent genuine, why do they get the benefit of the doubt? Why is it OK to continue associating with them when they have publicized and repeated known lies? Why doesn't someone like Caitlin Johnstone get the same treatment? Have Rania Khalek and Ben Norton's ignorant and misguided views regarding what happened on September 11th evolved? Or is it Abby and Robbie's views which have changed?

Last but not least is Mike Prysner, significant other to Abby Martin and producer for The Empire Files. A quick overview of Prysner should answer the question at the end of the previous paragraph. Prysner is an Iraq war veteran who first made a name for himself within the anti war movement after a speech he made condemning his war experience. Unlike Blumenthal Khalek and Norton, Prysner does not have a history of promoting lies about Libya and Syria, his view on those conflicts has been consistent. On the other hand, Prysner has been critical of the 9/11 truth movement. Prysner in 2011 tweeted (since deleted) asserting that 9/11 truth is racist. On top of this, Prysner used a pseudonym to attack the co founder of the San Diego 9/11 Truth group on Facebook. Going by the name "Pono Prinair," Prysner (who has very conveniently deleted the posts made by his alter ego) unleashed a verbal assault against Peter Holmes for asking Abby Martin why she did not question Noam Chomsky about September 11th during an interview. During the course of this, he labeled Holmes a sexist and a racist and chastised him for daring to question a female. Somehow though, this behavior is considered acceptable by Robbie Martin. The fact that Abby Martin is an active relationship with a man who believes

It should become clear to any honest person who takes the time to read this article and to check out the links I have provided that Robbie Martin's obsession with credibility and integrity is a charade, and that different standards apply to those who are pals with his sister and those who are not. In Robbie Martin's world, you can say or do pretty much whatever you want and It's perfectly OK, regardless of how vile it is, as long as you are friends with his sister. However, if you're not down with the Martins, then anything short of impeccable standards will be critiqued and scrutinized to the extreme. Let this serve as a classic case study as to what happens when young and talented activists place their careers and getting ahead in media over speaking the full truth.

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-6FBwOARncC0/WV6e-wGtOZI/AAAAAAAAAC0/9uioM2A1fAM7xdRhIdBQLPAYtokuOH6fQCLcBGAs/s320/PonoPrinair2.PNG

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-15lEeSmamNw/WV6fhMFnTgI/AAAAAAAAAC4/ihulr6eHA3sruKfBMmKfloRcbLOKfF3SwCLcBGAs/s320/PonoPrinair3.PNG

Abby and Mike (AKA Pono Prinair) having a great time hanging out with Clinton insider son and longtime foundation funded peddler of anti 9/11 truth vitriol and lies about Syria and Libya Max Blumenthal. Where is Robbie Martin's concern about credibility now?????

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-SWkuWe1jJyE/WV6hb_n5KCI/AAAAAAAAADE/bkld5ZQaYIkgcoz4VQzuOLZzafYNOqXSwCLcBGAs/s320/Cn8fUz8VUAAWLzH.jpg

Mike AKA Pono asks if he is the only person who finds 9/11 truth racist

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

PART 2

I will close this article by posting screen caps of the aforementioned Facebook post in which Mike Prysner uses two different accounts to verbally assault Peter Holmes for questioning Abby Martin about not getting Noam Chomsky's thoughts about what happened on September 11th. Keep in mind that this is Abby's producer and significant other.

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6FbvS7dlssE/WV6djH2znUI/AAAAAAAAAC8/uI6vEUjWtvUyepOhb-qJydWKiSNKbkMogCEwYBhgL/s320/Abby.PNG

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EfGICjeYgaA/WV6g21fMEBI/AAAAAAAAADA/tV94vlXkHicGy6ustz2UwoSiWUIVe3RqACLcBGAs/s320/abby2.PNG

Abby's old friend Peter Holmes quizzes her on why she did not question Noam Chomsky about 9/11 during their interview.

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-bbTENcd5rD8/WV6h7Cu0PCI/AAAAAAAAADI/cMSxo7WnJSsZZWW071_NpjQOOXvRMQt6QCLcBGAs/s320/Abby3.PNG

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-W8L8j_FRrnk/WV6iBX-q-OI/AAAAAAAAADM/xvMhd0HSa_IO1bJLPQI3G6sWY5f7YuP3wCLcBGAs/s320/Abby4.PNG

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6DVh6y_7iYw/WV6iGzYpIbI/AAAAAAAAADQ/wPhhLMY3c-0NHXOro07EQI027wOCsMC0wCLcBGAs/s320/Abby5.PNG

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-2sDw728p3Fs/WV6iRrSyf-I/AAAAAAAAADU/4CcXEQq26honzkfoHY92U8cBBm5TkqoFgCLcBGAs/s320/Abby6.PNG

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Xwh21kxZurg/WV6ieZXfYUI/AAAAAAAAADY/WVPXi7l6abgyzPq6Yv0dUEp_YV8G0mw5wCLcBGAs/s320/Abby7.PNG

Abby congratulates her friend for "educating" Peter about why exposing false flag terrorism is irrelevant.

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-WDa9HzTylts/WV6i74FofLI/AAAAAAAAADc/m5YRMZkce3Yz2v11uNi93WB49ueR8zFKgCLcBGAs/s320/Abby8.PNG

"Like Pono said." Why did "Pono" remove his posts?

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-7rJMdEbYvT0/WV6jjvRcCII/AAAAAAAAADg/h8B9q_lyWv8TLWQ0FEzpPSzsuQ6t2iDbwCLcBGAs/s320/Abby9.PNG

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-qgr13A6-dAk/WV6kf_j2itI/AAAAAAAAADk/8z7mFVHX0EEc44p2U9uQkmC-jGPvOnCpACLcBGAs/s320/Abby10.PNG

Mike AKA Pono chastises Peter for criticizing a woman who "is far more accomplished in this field than said man," after continuing to "educate" Peter about why the topics of false flag terror and the role of the Federal Reserve are inconsequential compared to the real roots of the problems affecting the world, racism and sexism! It's not much different, if you ask me, than David Horowitz "educating" Alex Jones about how false flags don't matter because the real conspiracy is that Islam is taking over the West, enabled by the evil Left. Different sides of the same controlled opposition coin.

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-7kg-t_VPcgM/WV6lEB5FPDI/AAAAAAAAADo/9zQQxxMDK7cdFG_nm_4PXoA9txWfabIHACLcBGAs/s320/Abby11.PNG

Now Mike/Pono brings Peter's race into the conversation.

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-etpyPSms_E8/WV6lXjjIZBI/AAAAAAAAADs/os7AH76id3g6q9fwYDdrlOXF0SiONMmLgCLcBGAs/s320/abby12.PNG

For daring to question Abby about giving Noam Chomsky a free pass on his years of deceptive commentary regarding September 11th and a host of other important issues, Peter is accused of exhibiting white male privilege.

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-FbvX6kYoGp4/WV6maIKEsWI/AAAAAAAAADw/WMLj23VmPRgq1A_8Y_mR414TrA-nI6HSQCLcBGAs/s320/Abby14.PNG

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-sGTZunEDMnw/WV6mgKjtY7I/AAAAAAAAAD0/K6caRsqHMbw6NT1FN6yOI1F-cZzbmjgawCLcBGAs/s320/Abby15.PNG

Peter addresses both Mike and "Pono." Did Abby Martin know that Prysner was using two different accounts to attack Holmes with? I think the answer is obvious. And according to Prysner, whether or not elements within the government assassinated the President of the United States is unimportant.

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Dm0Kvm8B718/WV6oIg4zXyI/AAAAAAAAAD4/hW5QKJ4gTJEhvvC5DRummmdct_WKpjs_ACLcBGAs/s320/abby16.PNG

Abby closes the conversation by praising Chomsky and Amy Goodman and Jeremy Scahill as allies. To quote Chomsky, "What difference does it make?" if they keep their massive support bases in the dark about the most consequential event of our generation????? This conversation took place over four years ago, and I can only imagine just how much Abby's views have "evolved" since then. Hard to tell, because she won't even address any of this now.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Trump stated clearly that the decision targets the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement (BDS) calling it an “anti-Semitic campaign against Israel.”

While it's not new that "anti-Semitism" can mean what ever they want it to mean, this might finally explode in their faces when we all don't give a shit about being called "anti-Semitic".

The non-violent BDS movement, however, was founded in 2005 by 170 Palestinian unions, political parties, refugee networks, and women organizations, among others, has gained such renown that it was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Obviously some bothered to rebel despite being a tribe-dominated Nobel organization.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

These are good points.

While it's not new that "anti-Semitism" can mean what ever they want it to mean, this might finally explode in their faces when we all don't give a shit about being called "anti-Semitic".

People still care about their reputation. The smear has long lost it's legitimacy.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Especially when it's Semite-on-Semite crimes we're against.

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Oh, she is the 9-11 Truther person. I wonder if she believes that or is just in it for the money.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

She isn't anymore because of the money.

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I figured that out later. Sort of hard to take such a person seriously, don't you think?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I dunno. She can't prove much on 9/11 that hasn't been proven or lied about. There's more at stake there.

By actually going to Gaza she can actually document and prove the shit that's going on there, no secret, no lies, just massacre - but for lower stakes than 9/11.

Maybe she picked that lane. Maybe it was picked for her. Maybe she was give the option of renouncing 9/11 or facing death or torture.

Everyone compromises somehow.