you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AbeFroman 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Because we need to break down everything by race these days. If we don't, people might just see others as just people, and judge them by their character, and we can't have that.

[–]Penelope 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You're saying diversity quotas are wrong then?

[–]DexterBrav0 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes they are. People should be assigned to positions for their abilities not for their race. That is just handicapping one ethnicity against another and saying that they're equally capable to manage the job. Take it like this. Give handicap in sports were one race is better than the other and see if it's equally competitive or fun to even watch. The one that has the best advantage (due to his/her genes and training) will have to triple the amount of work that she or he has to do in order to catch up.

On a side note, from a totally evolutionary point of view it might prove even more beneficial to the unhandicapped race given that only the best of the best can succeed and if they are lucky enough they will reproduce and have maybe even better offspring.

[–]AbeFroman 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Absolutely.