Hooded, handcuffed, and 'violated': South Dakota's use of forced catheterization

submitted by dcjogger from (statesmanjournal.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]RatherSmallPotato 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What about the guns? Isn't this the government tyranny they are meant for?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The second amendment was intended to protect people's right to speak their opinion.

This is so far beyond that it's beyond belief.

The founding fathers would certainly have understood defending yourself with a firearm in this scenario.

Having said that: Washington did chop off the toes of slaves who tried to escape, which is orders of magnitude worse. Given the choice I'd go with the catheter.

The in-justice system is criminal and we're overdue for a social revolution. Individual liberty is a conservative value that needs to be reclaimed.

We're seeing the tyrannical consequences of community rights/values.