you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Vigte[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I would further say it is better to ignore them.

Yes, turn a blind eye to the enemy and their communications, that's how "wars" are won.

Spreading RT's influence simply helps them in their attacks on us.

Only if one is t

Well I gave you a Times article about it too, so feel free to use that one - or google a publication of your preference... what, I just shouldn't cite/post anything "of the enemy"? Because that's literally 99% of... everything - including legitimate news that affects people here. You could have just as easily searched to see if it was true, yourself - I know you said you did, but if you had, you would have found the articles.

I'm just warning Saiditors who may live in the area, as I am wont to do when strange localized stories pop up - sorry you got upset about the source.

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I am not upset by the source. I am upset that you are doing your bit to make them seem like a legitimate news site.

[–]Vigte[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

When they report a legitimate news story...

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There are a number of sources you can give your eyeballs to. That is how they make their money. You decided to support Russia Today. Whatever. Knock yourself out. Still, others are allowed to comment on who you support.

[–]Vigte[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And if you want to have a heart attack clutching pearls over a source, rather than the story - then that's your prerogative.

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep. We all decide on our own morality. But now it is naptime.