all 6 comments

[–]FormosaOolong 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Thank you for staying on this, OP. This is a worldwide crisis and needs to be headlined every day.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

WikiLeaks is a limited hangout bro. We've all been duped.

[–]FormosaOolong 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Whatever one's opinion of WL or JA, it doesn't change the fact that there is an outright war on truth, and dissent, and a persecution of journalists and whistleblowers. When we stop being able to point at and criticize the misdeeds of the powerful--which is almost accomplished now--we are truly their slaves and prisoners. From your posts, I know you don't want that! Nobody wants that...

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

the fact that there is an outright war on truth, and dissent, and a persecution of journalists and whistleblowers. When we stop being able to point at and criticize the misdeeds of the powerful--which is almost accomplished now--we are truly their slaves and prisoners.

We're in complete agreement on these points. With few exceptions, we are aligned in our demands for justice and accountability.

However, if Wikileaks is controlled opposition, then the Epstein related tapes may have already leaked to wikileaks with the leaker disappeared, or dead. There's no way to know for sure.
Also, this would be the ultimate dead man's key, and he had to hold on to something.

We know that this guy was a medial darling at one time. He hacked the NSA and the Pentagon with minimal consequence. This would have gotten most people banished from MSM view, which is beyond suspiscious. Then Wikileaks gets famous overnight and he's the talk of the MSM for years...?

Virtually every leaker is banished by the MSM from public view.

Any "leakers" whom the MSM choose to venerate warrant serious skeptical reexamination.

[–]FormosaOolong 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

These are all excellent points, the only nit I could pick would be that JA allegedly only publishes what is given to him, he doesn't hack. But how would I know?!

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Have you read the Wikileaks on Russian corruption? Me neither because there are not any. Wikileaks is simply a front for the Russian.