you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

iow, not a single one of the creators of socialism was guided by a benevolence or care for the working class. the intention is simply not there, never was.. it was the polar opposite. they created scientific socialism not to free, but to subdue the masses and to strip them of both their material, but also mental possessions. the rothschilds, marx, engels, lenin, stalin, mao, castro, pol pot did nothing else but kill and rob. its not because 'thats not real socialism'. that was real socialism, put in practice exactly as fore-visioned by its creators and managers.

the ideals thought to be embedded in socialism are just not there in reality, not part of its genetic makeup, the people who created this ideology wanted only to fool the people (think snake oil salesman), but not actually give them what they promised. politics. pr. propaganda. public education. brainwashing. these are the vehicles they use to propagate this false promise.

socialism is kinda an offshot of organised crime / establishment of that era (engels and mazzini collaborated)

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Socialism is not the problem.

Sharing or being selfish is not the problem.

Balance is good. Transparency is good. Big government loses that.

Exploitation is bad. Big government exacerbates that. Regardless of ideology.

Besides Jimmy Carter, what US president has not "killed and robbed"?

Every negative (and positive) thing you say about socialism can be applied to capitalism. Government is organize crime. (I'm currently reading "CIA As Organized Crime" by Douglas Valentine.)

You are sooo wrong about socialism, and it's counter-Hegelian dialectic capitalism, I don't know where to begin and I need sleep. Take a red pill and call me in the morning.