you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Vulptex 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

It's basically gnosticism/prison planet, which is the truth. Minus all the weird mythological and esoteric stuff that the later ones added.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

You're explaining your subjective interpretation of someone else's work...okay buddy

[–]Vulptex 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

But it's true. And the writers, or supposed writers, even admitted it themselves.

This sort of stuff if found all throughout Hollywood, because the elites know the truth (or at least part of it). Unfortunately they seem to mostly side with the archons.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

But it's true

According to your dipshit interpretations.

Other people have just as valid interpretations in the total opposite direction to you.

Equally as valid as your nonsense views are the nonsense views of other people...can't believe I'm having to explain this....but the lessons and themes you take away from movies are not universal

[–]Vulptex 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

It's quite apparent, and the writers admitted it.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

First of all, when creators expand upon their creative visions, it's usually not referred to as them "admitting".

Secondly, why don't you link to some authoritative source that backs you up, instead of jabbering on

[–]TemporarilyDeceased 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Why is he expected to list another source when you aren't?

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because he made a claim and I didn't

He said "the writers admitted it". I make no claims about knowing what the writers did or did not intend with their creative vision.

My claim is nonsense: "the agents represent transphobia" is as much BS as whatever OP believes. But neither of OP or I are insisting we have the only correct interpretation according to the wachowski's "admittals" or whatever

"The writers admitted it" is a claim about the shared objective reality which he should be able to back up. He wants me to accept that his interpretation of a movie is the only correct one, because of some claimed statements by the wachowskis, so he should link them