you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Musky 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

the requirements for healthcare workers

Are you claiming it was just healthcare workers?

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Depends on state.

Doesn't matter though, because the antivaxer concerns were about the cyber helix, nanobots and 5G. Antivaxers were absolutely not saying 'okay sure it's net-harmless and effective but I don't like how in some states the mandates will go beyond healthcare workers, so ill refuse to take it out of solidarity with my nurse friends'

[–]Musky 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

That's disingenuous to lump people who were rightly concerned with the covid shot with fringe elements in order to discredit them. Right up there with demonizing ivermectin as horse dewormer.

I don't like how in some states the mandates will go beyond healthcare workers, so ill refuse to take it out of solidarity with my nurse friends'

Funny that, when half of the medical professionals didn't want something, you think the appropriate solution was to force their hands.

Since the covid vaccine does not stop the spread there was no benefit to forcing healthcare workers to get the covid shot in the first place. It doesn't improve recovery times, so there's no argument to be made for keeping the medical industry healthy and able to serve. And hospitalizations were less than 1% so there's no argument there either.

Past time to admit this was a boondoggle, so we don't repeat the pandemic mistakes.

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Well said. Clearly the pharma companies got a hold of government and media, and used these untested experimental shots as a source of profit, bolstered by the fear from covid. And now some percentage of people are damaged long-term from the shots.

The gaslighting around this issue is unreal (and probably paid for by pharma to occur in the media, including internet comments). But we saw what happened. We remember.

And like you said, humanity as a whole just made a huge mistake and we must learn from our mistakes so we don't repeat them.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, hold on, because arent you doing some gaslighting of your own here.

Let's try and lay out what you allege here

  1. The pharma companies needed a source of profit

  2. So they had untested shots

  3. And they used government and media to help create a revenue stream.

That's the extent of the alleged conspiracy.

What's not in this list? Anything blaringly obvious in its absence?

  • the extent of the conspiracy was us pharma companies selling untested vaccines

  • the conspiracy wasn't about a great reset

  • the conspiracy wasn't about eugenics

  • the conspiracy wasn't about a manufactured virus

  • it wasn't about an indefinite lockdown to imprison Americans in a new jade helm or whatever

  • there isn't a vaccine app on your phone that you have to show anywhere in 2023

So let's be very clear: If anyone thought that any of these things were true, then they were misled and fooled, because the extent of the conspiracy was a functional but possibly not fully tested vaccine that got America and the world back on track, net-harmlessly.

So if anyone has comments in their history claiming that anything beyond pharma profit lines were happening - then they need to go and think about why they were so incorrect and misled two years ago.

Wouldn't want to gaslight anyone, would we