all 53 comments

[–]UncleWillard56 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Or better yet, why do people want their kids to see drag queens? What's the benefit? It's not like there are billions of them walking around everywhere. Likely, kids would never interact with one in irl unless their parents took them to one of these readings.

[–]1Icemonkey 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

God hates fags.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

You've got a misspelling there. God hates figs. Jesus didn't say anything against fags.

[–][deleted]  (7 children)

[removed]

    [–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    Yeah. They're mistaken about that too.

    [–][deleted]  (5 children)

    [removed]

      [–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      but you are on target that drag queens should be teaching young children to twerk and transition to the opposite sex?

      I get from the question mark that you're trying to ask a question. But I can't parse it. What target are we talking about here? What is "to twerk and transition to the opposite sex"?

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [removed]

        [–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        You seem to be upset about something, and it's interfering with your ability to be coherent.

        Take a deep breath, and try to explain yourself succinctly.

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        preach it brotha

        [–]spaghetti 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        'sup d3.

        [–]LarrySwinger2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Good one.

        [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (39 children)

        Isn't it to capture the imagination and play of the gender fluidity of childhood and to give kids glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role models?

        [–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

        Uh, no? It's to put perverts in contact with children? Pedophilia is all over the left.

        [–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        [–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        Oh look, it's whataboutism! The lefts only non defense when the rampant support for pedophiles is brought up.

        [–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Okay, I've shown some of the pedophilia on the right.

        What pedophilia "all over the left"?

        [–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        You haven't noticed the pedophile groomers in public schools? Seriously?

        I know the left consumes censored media and gets a distorted view of the world, but this much?

        This isn't new either, the sexual liberation of children has been a project of the left for decades. NAMBLA was mainstream Democrat.

        [–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (33 children)

        Wouldn't it be better to simply ignore gender entirely?

        [–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (32 children)

        Kids will notice gender as they go through puberty.

        At least with these role models, those few who don't fit the boxes exactly won't be as subject to the feelings of isolation.

        [–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (31 children)

        Kids won't notice boxes that don't exist.

        [–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (27 children)

        IIR puberty C, I'm pretty sure I would've noticed the boxes whether there were preconceptions about them or not.

        [–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (26 children)

        Okay but drag doesn't involve any of those.

        [–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (25 children)

        It involves role models with gender that doesn't box.

        [–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

        Then we're no longer talking about puberty and are back to stereotypes. This is just going in a circle.

        [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

        Ignoring gender won't make it not exist.

        [–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

        Yes it will. If it's all social, and we get rid of it, it no longer exists.

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)

        [removed]

          [–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          either operate the forum or use it, but do not do both.

          Sorry? What's your meaning here?