you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]JasonCarswell 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

    He left, dumbass. (Bullying by selfish pricks like you keeps Saidit very small.)

    You can't fool us, socks. Your bad-faith stench is unmistakable.

    You're the only one who bitches about bullies while being one. And you're a timesuck, so no more for you.

    /u/magnora7, it's time to ban bad-faith socks again, aka /u/FozzieBear, and openly develop and create a Laundry Team until bad-faith socks understands what "banned" means. Let the community do the heavy lifting here. More eyes and minds are better than one or a few sets. Set it up so you (or your minions) have little to do but execute what the good-faith anti-socks committee determines are socks-alts. This requires a little trust from you, and from our community. This can all be openly discussed and checked in a dedicated /s/unsocks. Users with established characters (not new or rare users) and their allegiances will be weighted and trusted with a grain of source, but all may discuss the matter as they see fit. If there's any interest in this public trial, I suspect the coliseum novelty will wear thin after a while, and there will be those reliable users that stick it out for the betterment of SaidIt, and those who reliably oppose. In time the sides will filter down and become very clearly defined. Ultimately it's a trial of endurance, for both sides, that may ebb and flow with his bad-faith appearances. socks will have to either change his tenor and strategies - or give up. And/or SaidIt can evolve further too.

    cc /u/Vulptex

    [–]Vulptex 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    So you want the admins to "do more" about "problem users". Sounds a lot like what people used to complain about on reddit back in its early days. And eventually the admins did step it up, and that's why we had to flee here.

    I don't want to see socks banned. If there's vote manipulation going on that needs to stop, but I think you just want to ban socks because you don't like him. And it can't be guilty until proven innocent.

    [–]LordoftheFlies 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Two sides of the same coin, each complaining that the other side is why we can't have nice things.

    [–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    You clearly don't know what you're talking about.