you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nope.

The claim is normally that most scientists, or 99.99 scientists agree, which is accurate.

And we see in the MSM, on Saidit and elsewhere regularly that there are several people with science backgrounds who are anti-vax campaigners. They get too much attention for their misinformation and disinformation (and they are well-funded):

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/health-coronavirus-vaccines-skeptic/

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/06/us/politics/anti-vax-scientist-senate-hearing.html

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02989-9

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/08/robert-malone-vaccine-inventor-vaccine-skeptic/619734/

Merely search: anti vaccine scientists

[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes. You are redpilled about zionists but still believe reuters and nytimes. Very convincing. Definitely not a shill.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I still don't know anyone who talks about red pills. It's a strange thing to read. I don't get it. Based on a movie? And as we know, newspapers have information, some of it biased. Depends on the article or author, right? My POINT is that anti-vaxxers have plenty of access to people who have scientific knowledge and are using what little they know to argue that vaccines are bad, and they aren't censored - at least not in most places.