use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~2 users here now
memes
All the scientists agree.
submitted 2 years ago by LarrySwinger2 from files.catbox.moe
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (2 children)
Nope.
The claim is normally that most scientists, or 99.99 scientists agree, which is accurate.
And we see in the MSM, on Saidit and elsewhere regularly that there are several people with science backgrounds who are anti-vax campaigners. They get too much attention for their misinformation and disinformation (and they are well-funded):
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/health-coronavirus-vaccines-skeptic/
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/06/us/politics/anti-vax-scientist-senate-hearing.html
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02989-9
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/08/robert-malone-vaccine-inventor-vaccine-skeptic/619734/
Merely search: anti vaccine scientists
[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (1 child)
Yes. You are redpilled about zionists but still believe reuters and nytimes. Very convincing. Definitely not a shill.
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
I still don't know anyone who talks about red pills. It's a strange thing to read. I don't get it. Based on a movie? And as we know, newspapers have information, some of it biased. Depends on the article or author, right? My POINT is that anti-vaxxers have plenty of access to people who have scientific knowledge and are using what little they know to argue that vaccines are bad, and they aren't censored - at least not in most places.
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)